It's all a dog and pony show at this point on what they all want to "think".
amp.cnn.com
The two step thing could sure get interesting and over rule a lot of gun laws on the book. Clarence Thomas is a hero.
Second Amendment: What the Supreme Court’s new gun rights ruling means | CNN Politics
Justice Clarence Thomas opened the floodgates for all sorts of gun safety laws to be challenged in federal court.
This is important. Some here called this out, and now it's here the very same day as the naive celebrate the "great victory". These fucking criminal politicians have the state by the balls and they are MUCH MUCH MUCH more powerful and will never stop infringing NY's gun rights away 24/7 vs most of the nearly useless 2A organizations that are a rabbit fart in the wind and are no match for the state.NYC Council pushing to expand ‘sensitive locations’ after SCOTUS gun ruling
The New York City Council plans to press state lawmakers to dramatically expand the state’s current list of “sensitive locations” where guns can be banned after a Supreme Court ruling Thursday left it as one of the few avenues available to restrict handguns in the Big Apple.
Council Speaker Adrienne Adams said she plans to pass a non-binding resolution that would call on Albany to ban guns from all government buildings, schools, hospitals, places of worship, parks, daycares and cemeteries and other facilities — and establish a 1,000 foot buffer around those places where guns would also be banned.
Additionally, she said she hoped state lawmakers would consider making population density alone criteria for establishing a ‘sensitive location,’ which would effectively ban the carrying of handguns in most of New York City.
The majority on the Supreme Court seemed to warn away from such an approach, but Adams said she was hopeful lawyers could craft a workaround.
But when asked if the goal of the buffer zones and density requirements would be to again effective ban widespread handgun ownership in the five boroughs, “an effective citywide gun ban blanket,” Adams says that it was.
Additionally, she said she hoped state lawmakers would consider making population density alone criteria for establishing a ‘sensitive location,’ which would effectively ban the carrying of handguns in most of New York City.
NYC Council pushing to expand ‘sensitive locations’ after SCOTUS gun ruling
The New York City Council plans to press state lawmakers to dramatically expand the current list of “sensitive locations” where guns can be banned.nypost.com
Not sure how to respond to that
Sour Grapes. Poor Merrick Garland thinks he deserves a seat on the Supreme Court. This is his version of "dissent" Oh well. Let it play out. Let the Dems do whatever they want, the courts will continue to settle this.
Gone are the days when people, celebrities, heads of agencies had a sense of propriety and didn't feel compelled to offer an unsolicited opinion.
He doesn't know how to respond to that
For new people wanting a permit it could be big.
NBC poisoning the well with a misleading photo (or they're just that clueless). They're implying "open carry" to incite knee jerk public reaction.
"OMG, NY will become like 45 other states where people are freer. We can't possibly have that".
townhall.com
thats because its the Dept, of Just-us ~~~~the democRATS have that dump wrapped around there little finger
turns out, Just-US is not blind, its actually a political arm of the left
