Trump makes statement about suppressors

[Edwardteach72]

And you guessed it... he doesnt like them (like bump stocks)


"Q The suspect in the Virginia Beach shooting used a silencer on his weapon. Do you believe that silencers should be restricted?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t like them at all."


Trump on Firearm Suppressors: "I don't like them at all" - CarbonTV Blog

Remarks by President Trump Before Marine One Departure | The White House

 

[Edwardteach72]

Unless he was meaning the restrictions

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[@thewheels]

Maybe he just really likes deaf people.

 

[Phazer]

Trump is ignorant about the specifics about how suppressors work and what "silencers" really are.

His sons need to educate him. They are knowledgeable about firearms.

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

Maybe he just really likes deaf people.

What?

 

[Edwardteach72]

Trump is ignorant about the specifics about how suppressors work and what "silencers" really are.

His sons need to educate him. They are knowledgeable about firearms.

He doesn't care about them, watch them take a hit like bump stocks and people will love him for it

 

[Uzi]

Better than Hillary though.

 

[Edwardteach72]

Better than Hillary though.

I'm waiting for

1) that comment (unironically)

2) doesnt affect me (cause NY) so I don't care

3) they are just an accessory and not covered by the 2A so it doesnt matter

4) 7382 dementional string theory chess while you all play checkers

 

[@thewheels]

3) they are just an accessory and not covered by the 2A so it doesnt matter

 

[Edwardteach72]

Hey now all the bootlicker, trump cucks, and NRA fudds/boomers use that to justify the Trump bumpstock ban

 

[Marine Cpl]

Trump was never a true 2A supporter as was Reagan and both Bush’s also never true 2A supporters but when it comes to 2 choices that you have to vote for that will actually win compared to a write in vote, the choice is pretty clear.

Had I had to do it all over again knowing what I know now, Trump would still get my vote compared to Hillary. He still will get it next election as well unless I find Kamala Harris to better represent my views and that’s not likely.

There has never been a true pro 2A president in our lifetimes and there never will be. Let’s face the facts. Everyone in charge is for gun control. Some more so than others. Even the politicians that have 2A A+ plus ratings are for gun control in some form by supporting NICS checks, the NFA, etc.

So when it comes down to it, only a fool would waste their vote or stay home giving the one candidate with a more solid gun control agenda a better chance of winning.

No one is cucking anyone.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Of course there is no happiness in some of his approach to firearms. There, I got the obvious out of the way. Now, as far as the other stuff, I hope he burns the mother f'in house down related to the deep state and such. Yes, IMHO he is the best candidate to clean house that way. If I can't have perfection I'll still take that.

 

[prambo]

Hey now all the bootlicker, trump cucks, and NRA fudds/boomers use that to justify the Trump bumpstock ban

My, my, my, someone has their panties in a twist today.

I'm a "boomer", so what?

 

[Edwardteach72]

My, my, my, someone has their panties in a twist today.

I'm a "boomer", so what?

Sorry that your ego is so fragile that you feel personally attacked by a word


***edit*** I'm not actually sorry

 

[Modean]

Hey now all the bootlicker, trump cucks, and NRA fudds/boomers use that to justify the Trump bumpstock ban

Well, neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is required to defend ones self or others, so what’s your issue? My ARs work just fine without those add ons. And and far as being a boomer, what’s your issue there?

 

[Edwardteach72]

Well, neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is required to defend ones self or others, so what’s your issue? My ARs work just fine without those add ons. And and far as being a boomer, what’s your issue there?

And here we have another enemy of the 2A

 

[Edwardteach72]

Well, neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is required to defend ones self or others, so what’s your issue? My ARs work just fine without those add ons. And and far as being a boomer, what’s your issue there?

Where in the 2A does it specifically say "armes required for defense" ? I keep.looking at the text and it says nothing about "required" for anything

 

[Modean]

Where in the 2A does it specifically say "armes required for defense" ? I keep.looking at the text and it says nothing about "required" for anything

It doesn’t. Neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is an arm either.

 

[Edwardteach72]

It doesn’t. Neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is an arm either.

So you completely accept the safe act and support such.. got it, enemy of the 2A makes sense

 

[spat]

It doesn’t. Neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is an arm either.

You could maybe make that argument about bump stocks, since no military in their right mind would ever issue them, but suppressors are very much arms.

 

[prambo]

Sorry that your ego is so fragile that you feel personally attacked by a word


***edit*** I'm not actually sorry

You, "sir", have an anger problem, as well as an inflated ego.

You're also insulting people who haven't given you any reason to, other than call you on behaving like a patent ass.

So, being that I have no use or time for people who spout bullshit and invective, welcome to my "Ignore" list.

PS - most, if not all, of your arguments are ill thought out, have no supportive evidence and your style is nothing but blather and insult.

 

[Edwardteach72]

You, "sir", have an anger problem, as well as an inflated ego.

You're also insulting people who haven't given you any reason to, other than call you on behaving like a patent ass.

So, being that I have no use or time for people who spout bullshit and invective, welcome to my "Ignore" list.

PS - most, if not all, of your arguments are ill thought out, have no supportive evidence and your style is nothing but blather and insult.

Oh nooo a boomer for sad about words I said and put me on an ignore list oh nooo sorry to make the snowflake so sad I dont think I will sleep a wink tonight


Ps. Not angry at all, actually generally speaking I'm a very happy go lucky guy, except when I first wake up I'm usually a little meh but that's because I lose a lot of sleep over what some random old person online thinks of me

 

[BDinPutnam]

Of course there is no happiness in some of his approach to firearms. There, I got the obvious out of the way. Now, as far as the other stuff, I hope he burns the mother f'in house down related to the deep state and such. Yes, IMHO he is the best candidate to clean house that way. If I can't have perfection I'll still take that.

Maybe he could, you know... GET AROUND TO IT ALREADY?

 

[Hillbilly77]

Oh, fuckin’ goodie.

More infighting among gun owners while the antis wring their hands.

 

[Curmudgeon]

You left out the word "ignorant" in your thread title. It can either go at the beginning or before the word "statement".

8d chess bichez.

 

[Edwardteach72]

Oh, fuckin’ goodie.

More infighting among gun owners while the antis wring their hands.

Well that's because some (many) "gun owners" are nothing more than turncoats, so sorry I dont want anti 2A members in the same ranks as pro gun rights

 

[holdover]

Sorry that your ego is so fragile that you feel personally attacked by a word


***edit*** I'm not actually sorry

 

[Edwardteach72]

You left out the word "ignorant" in your thread title. It can either go at the beginning or before the word "statement".

8d chess bichez.

Come on now 8d chess is for peasant, trump is playing string theory chess while the demorats are playing checkers

 

[ArmedCorgi]

And you guessed it... he doesnt like them (like bump stocks)


"Q The suspect in the Virginia Beach shooting used a silencer on his weapon. Do you believe that silencers should be restricted?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t like them at all."


Trump on Firearm Suppressors: "I don't like them at all" - CarbonTV Blog

Remarks by President Trump Before Marine One Departure | The White House

 

[BMF JK]

Well, neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is required to defend ones self or others, so what’s your issue? My ARs work just fine without those add ons. And and far as being a boomer, what’s your issue there?

Your AR will work, how bout your ears after blasting a few rounds inside your home ?