GOA suing to get rid of NFA

Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,309
Reaction score
39,714
Location
Western NY
gunsamerica.com

BREAKING: 2A Groups Sue to Kill NFA After Trump Bill Passes

Gun Owners of America (GOA) just announced plans for what it’s calling the “One Big Beautiful Lawsuit” to tear down the NFA’s remaining registration mandates.
gunsamerica.com gunsamerica.com
I figured I’d post it but we all know what will come of it…. And that’s that they will ask us for more money to win it.
 
Z

Zerex

.308 Win
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
2,320
Location
Rome, NY
There is not a Politician who likes MG's Pistols, silencers SBR's, AR's etc etc.

SCOTUS upheld the ban on ghost Guns.........so that ban states like NYS were ok.
Scotus refused to hear Snopes...........a pocket veto of sorts, upholding AW ban states like NYS.

If SCOTUS ruled that the NFA was illegal on a tax basis, it would open up the door...........SCOTUS will likely never hear the case...................another pocket Veto.

A danger exists............the 2nd is an amendment, just like Prohibition.............it can be changed by a new amendment, requiring restrictions on ownership-- only for sporting purposes and no AW's.
Once the politicians are aggravated enough by us they will do it.

This might pass TODAY.

"The need for a militia having passed over time, the right to keep and bear arms is now restricted to licensed individuals, and no small arms/weapons of war can exist in civilian hands."

THIS WOULD INDUBITABLY PASS THE HOUSE AND SENATE..............TODAY.......... AND be ratified by ALL necessary 42 STATES, IF NOT ALL 50, by December '25.



The so called BOR is subject to being changed, as there are no natural rights
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,309
Reaction score
39,714
Location
Western NY
Cavalry said:
And NY will still have an outright ban on NFA items in the end.

If I lived in a free state even being part of the NFA registry scheme, I would be going crazy with those $0 tax stamps.
Click to expand...
I would get a few suppressors and I’d love and SBR.
 
Old Jalopy

Old Jalopy

.45 acp
Messages
349
Reaction score
430
Location
Upstate NY
Cavalry said:
And NY will still have an outright ban on NFA items in the end.

If I lived in a free state even being part of the NFA registry scheme, I would be going crazy with those $0 tax stamps.
Click to expand...
Maybe, but maybe not. Who's going to buy a suppressor for a firearm they don't own? NY might just say, "Hmmmm. They might not have to go through NFA anymore, but we can make them have to register them per a state law. Then we have another veiled illegal registry.". Never trust those who would deny freedom in the first place.
 
Cavalry

Cavalry

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,002
Reaction score
8,792
Location
Behind Enemy Lines
Old Jalopy said:
Maybe, but maybe not. Who's going to buy a suppressor for a firearm they don't own? NY might just say, "Hmmmm. They might not have to go through NFA anymore, but we can make them have to register them per a state law. Then we have another veiled illegal registry.". Never trust those who would deny freedom in the first place.
Click to expand...
I guess I am not following you. NY has a State ban on most NFA items, that will not change regardless of what the Fed does. The only direction NY will go is doubling down on the infringements, they will make them even more illegal to jam up someone visiting that does not know better.
 
Old Jalopy

Old Jalopy

.45 acp
Messages
349
Reaction score
430
Location
Upstate NY
Cavalry said:
I guess I am not following you. NY has a State ban on most NFA items, that will not change regardless of what the Fed does. The only direction NY will go is doubling down on the infringements, they will make them even more illegal to jam up someone visiting that does not know better.
Click to expand...
:confused:
Uh....... This is all hypothetical. It's all it ever is, so that's where I drew my comment from. Fantasy. BUT!....
So over here we have NY. The second most unfriendly gun state. They like to make laws to keep an eye on us law-abiding citizens even if those laws are not legal, like the ammo registry. It would not surprise me (and shouldn't anyone else either) if they lifted said bans and passed a law that you would have to register the suppressor or get a permit, like the new semi auto rifle license. Going that route would create a new illegal registry because people who decided to buy a suppressor would need a permit. Never underestimate the left anti-gun agenda. They aren't as dumb as they seem. They lie about facts, yes, but they aren't entirely stupid, and if it would help their cause they would do it.
Different topic, but fits what I'm saying. The full inclusion crossbow bill. DB touted she was all for this, yet now that it passed everything but getting her signature, she's going to let it sit there to get a veto by default. They lie, but aren't always dumb.
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,309
Reaction score
39,714
Location
Western NY
Old Jalopy said:
:confused:
Uh....... This is all hypothetical. It's all it ever is, so that's where I drew my comment from. Fantasy. BUT!....
So over here we have NY. The second most unfriendly gun state. They like to make laws to keep an eye on us law-abiding citizens even if those laws are not legal, like the ammo registry. It would not surprise me (and shouldn't anyone else either) if they lifted said bans and passed a law that you would have to register the suppressor or get a permit, like the new semi auto rifle license. Going that route would create a new illegal registry because people who decided to buy a suppressor would need a permit. Never underestimate the left anti-gun agenda. They aren't as dumb as they seem. They lie about facts, yes, but they aren't entirely stupid, and if it would help their cause they would do it.
Different topic, but fits what I'm saying. The full inclusion crossbow bill. DB touted she was all for this, yet now that it passed everything but getting her signature, she's going to let it sit there to get a veto by default. They lie, but aren't always dumb.
Click to expand...
I’d argue we’re worse than California for guns and at least they have Benitez.
 
Cooolone

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,262
Reaction score
9,685
Location
NY, USA
Zerex said:
This might pass TODAY.
Click to expand...
All interesting...

But I singled this out for a purpose. With a majority of States now recognizing Constitutional Carry, I would argue your view is colored by your locale (NY).

There's not a snowball chance in hell any amendment curbing 2A Rights would succeed today! None! Despite what the media would have you believe!

Old Jalopy said:
Maybe, but maybe not. Who's going to buy a suppressor for a firearm they don't own?
Click to expand...

Suppressors are not attached to firearms, their filed by caliber! And you can swap them among firearms with the same caliber... So yes, you can and do actually buy suppressors for "firearms" you don't own. Especially some have tolerance across calibers although it impacts the performance (suppression).

And just to be clear, NY will never allow relaxation of their MALFEASANCE towards 2A! Period! Obvious in the aftermath of the Bruen Ruling!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top