nygunforum.com
Good luck with that one. Seems pretty ripe for a 1A suit. Component parts? So having a print for a stock would be illegal? Sure thing. Cant stop the signal bitch.Make it a crime for a person to intentionally sell, distribute, or possess digital instructions to illegally manufacture or produce a firearm or component parts without a license.
Beyond laughable. I am sure all those chinese printer companies give a flying fuck what she thinks or decrees. The chinese are well known for following American law as evidenced by glock swtiches. How exactly would this even work? 3D printers do not know what they are printing and most if not all do not require a internet connection to print or check what its printing against databases. Even if the printer companies were compelled to do such things, there are millions of printers out there. One can literally build their own.Create a first-in-the-nation policy that requires the establishment of minimum safety standards for 3D printer manufacturers to ensure their products are equipped with technology that blocks the printer from creating firearms and component parts.
Strangely enough we are back to the illegal devices that are already illegal, but that is not the concern. The only people that will be laughing at this more than the chinese printer companies will be firearms manufacturers. I am sure they are quaking in their boots. What about the millions of existing Glocks out there? Hows that new GenV that "cant accept" a switch working out for Glock? Why only pistols? Are rifles somehow too hard to convert (retorical question)Require gun manufacturers to design pistols so they cannot be quickly and easily modified into DIY machine guns through the use of illegal devices, such as Glock switches.