Illinois assault weapons ban: US Supreme Court refuses to block law

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,448
Reaction score
137,739
Location
livingston county
The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb. FULL STORY: https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/ill...


WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb.

The justices did not comment in refusing an emergency appeal from a gun rights group and others.
 
J

JRtraderny

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
1,425
Location
USA
livingston said:
The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb. FULL STORY: https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/ill...


WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb.

The justices did not comment in refusing an emergency appeal from a gun rights group and others.
Click to expand...
I really don't understand the SC lately they say the states can't ban them but won't put a stop to this BS .
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,959
Reaction score
38,566
Location
Livingston
how many will be shot in Illinois this weekend ??

they have the highest gun ban / control laws ..

but they have the highest shooting rates ...

bring on the numbers ..
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,076
Reaction score
15,800
Location
Rochester
The S.C. knows damned well that this will result in registrations and people selling or turning in their guns. Yet the S.C. doesn't seem to care that people WILL be "injured" by this unConstitutional law. I just don't understand what their problem is. It's almost like they want to walk back their own decision.
 
Bigfoot

Bigfoot

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,962
Reaction score
46,641
Location
On the Trump Train
Grimscale said:
The S.C. knows damned well that this will result in registrations and people selling or turning in their guns. Yet the S.C. doesn't seem to care that people WILL be "injured" by this unConstitutional law. I just don't understand what their problem is. It's almost like they want to walk back their own decision.
Click to expand...
It sure does seem like it doesn't it?
 
Z

Zerex

.308 Win
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
2,498
Location
Rome, NY
THIS IS OLD NEWS........................ SCOTUS did not act on an emergency petition regarding an Illinois State Case..............a Federal Case needs to be brought................
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,448
Reaction score
137,739
Location
livingston county

Court says that AR-15s are NOT GUNS!​


National Association for Gun Rights
Hannah Hill, Executive Director of Legal Affairs for the National Association for Gun Rights, details why the Supreme Court denied our emergency appeal in our Naperville, IL lawsuit and what it means for the future.
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,524
Reaction score
48,460
Location
rochester
livingston said:
The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb. FULL STORY: https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/ill...


WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to put on hold a new Illinois law that would ban high-power semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in a Chicago suburb.

The justices did not comment in refusing an emergency appeal from a gun rights group and others.
Click to expand...
Just curious. Do low power or regular power semiautomatic weapons exist?
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,959
Reaction score
38,566
Location
Livingston
the SCOTUS likes it to let it play out in the lower courts before they intervene ..

yeah it sucks .. rights are being delayed over that .. but it is what it is .. and i do think it should be changed ..

now that this case is a done deal .. the whole case will now be stent to SCOTUS in writ of certiorari ..

how they want it .. and it could be combined with a 9th circus case too


 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,076
Reaction score
15,800
Location
Rochester
Acer-m14 said:
now that this case is a done deal .. the whole case will now be stent to SCOTUS in writ of certiorari ..
Click to expand...
To be heard when? And when will a decision finally be made?
And, in the interim, people will be going to jail! Losing their jobs, their homes, etc.
Will the S.C. be giving those people restitution? No?


When there is a law that infringes a Right, it should automatically be enjoined until proven that it does not violate the Constitution.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,448
Reaction score
137,739
Location
livingston county
Grimscale said:
To be heard when? And when will a decision finally be made?
And, in the interim, people will be going to jail! Losing their jobs, their homes, etc.
Will the S.C. be giving those people restitution? No?


When there is a law that infringes a Right, it should automatically be enjoined until proven that it does not violate the Constitution.
Click to expand...
I mentioned this before , Ran across a you tube years ago. It was a meeting of city or state lawmakers. One fellow was saying.. This law is illegal but we will have it on the books for 10 years before it is struck down .... and that was the plan all along.... Force their will on the public for years
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top