Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Here is a quick look at this sight in use.
Initial review of Meprolite FT Bullseye pistol "red dot" sight
- Thread starter Phazer
- Start date
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I may have to try it out. I just wish I hadn't already changed all of my Glock sights.
Maybe for my XDS?
Maybe for my XDS?
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The sights you're referring to are still a standard front and rear sight set.
The FT Bullseye is a hybrid rear-only sight.
minderasr
6.5 Creedmoor
I have the same sights on my G19. I really like them.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Yes I understand their are differences that's why I said similar. They light up very bright especially in dusky conditions. Also the off colored front sight does draw your eye.
I like the sights your referring too I just wonder in a self defense situation would you(meaning anyone) try too hard to align the sights too perfectly and make it hard to take the shot when needed??
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I saw these in the nra magazine. I did not realize they did not have a front sight. Interesting I can say.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I just came across another evaluation of the FT Bullseye:
Product review: Meprolight’s FT Bullseye pistol sight (w/Video)
Conclusions
The FT Bullseye, as advertised, is definitely innovative.
It’s low-profile.
It appears rugged.
It fits in standard holsters without the need for any modifications.
It doesn’t require any permanent modifications to the firearm.
It performs much better outdoors than indoors.
The FT Bullseye retails for around $200. In my humble opinion, that’s a bit pricey. Several other shooters said they’d be interested for around $100. I agree.
I’d like to see a larger diameter tube used to house the optics. This would make acquiring a sight picture easier and quicker, even for those with younger eyes.
I’d like to see the rear glass embedded deeper inside the mount, which would create a sun shade of sorts, and prevent ambient light from reflecting off the rear glass, which can wash out the sight.
With traditional iron sights, a shooter needs to incorporate three focal planes into a sight picture: rear sight, front sight and the target. The FT Bullseye cuts this down to two: the sight and the target. That’s a distinct advantage.
Of course there will be comparisons between the FT Bullseye and an electronic red-dot sight, which only requires a shooter to focus on one focal plane — the dot on the target — but the two are vastly different optics.
Additionallly, red dots are bulkier and some require modifications to the handgun that the FT Bullseye does not, nor does it need batteries.
Shooters unfamiliar with a red-dot will often “hunt” for the dot, which slows their shooting considerably. I encountered the same problem with the FT Bullseye, at least indoors.
When shooting outdoors, the sight works as advertised. It’s quick, accurate and deserving of the buzz it’s creating.
Currently, the FT Bullseye is available for all Glock and Springfield XD and XDM models. Meprolight says there will be versions coming soon for the H&K VP9, Smith and Wesson M&P, Sig Sauer, Ruger and Remington R1.
Product review: Meprolight’s FT Bullseye pistol sight (w/Video)
Conclusions
The FT Bullseye, as advertised, is definitely innovative.
It’s low-profile.
It appears rugged.
It fits in standard holsters without the need for any modifications.
It doesn’t require any permanent modifications to the firearm.
It performs much better outdoors than indoors.
The FT Bullseye retails for around $200. In my humble opinion, that’s a bit pricey. Several other shooters said they’d be interested for around $100. I agree.
I’d like to see a larger diameter tube used to house the optics. This would make acquiring a sight picture easier and quicker, even for those with younger eyes.
I’d like to see the rear glass embedded deeper inside the mount, which would create a sun shade of sorts, and prevent ambient light from reflecting off the rear glass, which can wash out the sight.
With traditional iron sights, a shooter needs to incorporate three focal planes into a sight picture: rear sight, front sight and the target. The FT Bullseye cuts this down to two: the sight and the target. That’s a distinct advantage.
Of course there will be comparisons between the FT Bullseye and an electronic red-dot sight, which only requires a shooter to focus on one focal plane — the dot on the target — but the two are vastly different optics.
Additionallly, red dots are bulkier and some require modifications to the handgun that the FT Bullseye does not, nor does it need batteries.
Shooters unfamiliar with a red-dot will often “hunt” for the dot, which slows their shooting considerably. I encountered the same problem with the FT Bullseye, at least indoors.
When shooting outdoors, the sight works as advertised. It’s quick, accurate and deserving of the buzz it’s creating.
Currently, the FT Bullseye is available for all Glock and Springfield XD and XDM models. Meprolight says there will be versions coming soon for the H&K VP9, Smith and Wesson M&P, Sig Sauer, Ruger and Remington R1.
MarkS1
.177 BB
Some background on the FT Bullseye. A few years ago TAS developed the concept and introduced a fiber-optic featuring the dot/circle alignment. Meprolight saw the potential in the product and purchased the design and went to work improving it. They added tritium, added an optical lens and enhanced the reticle.
It is a combat sight and can be used to rack the slide. The low profile allows you to continue using your same holster. Disclaimer; I work for their marketing/ad agency which is why I was able to get my hands on one early on and run some magazines using them. Personally, I prefer the green version over the red, my eyes seem to pick it up the dot/circle faster. This is the second video we filmed.
It is a combat sight and can be used to rack the slide. The low profile allows you to continue using your same holster. Disclaimer; I work for their marketing/ad agency which is why I was able to get my hands on one early on and run some magazines using them. Personally, I prefer the green version over the red, my eyes seem to pick it up the dot/circle faster. This is the second video we filmed.
Well I am wondering if I should get a 1911 slide milled for this sight.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I like the both eyes open shooting easily because that's hard for me to do. I wonder how easy it is to actually aquire the sight though. Is it really that Michael easier than aligning a 3 dot sight? I'd be really curious to try one or see one at some point. It looks interesting. Too bad I just bought night sights.
MarkS1
.177 BB
It really is easier. You may be in luck. Counter displays are being made which will include the FT Bullseye on a blue gun. It's not the same as pulling the trigger but it should at least allow you to see the sight for yourself.
MarkS1
.177 BB
The Mako Group is having an election Flash Sale. “Make Guns Great Again” 16% off everything, code POTUS. Go to the Mako website and put in the code. If you procrastinate, there will be a Black Friday sale but supplies of some products are limited.
MarkS1
.177 BB
The Mako Group just announced its Black Friday Sale, 30% off everything. This brings the cost of the FT Bullseye down $139.99. Go to their website, www.themakogroup.com and use Promo Code BF30.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Has anybody tried this sight yet? I'm looking to request this as a Christmas present from my wife.
I'm interested too. Not that they will offer it for the the most undeservedly overlooked pistol on the market, the PPQ.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I know there are more ergonomic guns or cooler guns out there but that's why I picked a Glock. They make everything for it.
Most other guns are just wildcats.
Last edited:
freddy
.308 Win
I don't get it. Why not a set of Trijicons? What sights are you running now?
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Ameriglo's. I wanted a red dot but they are too big.
But I don't like Glocks. I am considering an M&P for a mainstream gun.
freddy
.308 Win
Got it.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I don't like Glocks either but they work and nobody makes a 10+1 that small with all the aftermarket support.
If I don't like a thing I want nothing to do with it. I don't compromise on my gun shit.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Hmmm....red vs green?
I like the red front sight on my Trijicon HD setup. But, the videos show a really nice looking green.
Decisions...decisions.....
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I feel that way about 10+1. I don't want 6+1 or 7+1 or 8+1 and won't compromise on that so I understand where you are coming from.
I suppose outside of a ban state the 10+ loses a little of its urgency. If I feel a need gor more capacity than the Shield I can step up to the PPQ, though I rarely do.
Fixed it for you