Rittenhouse being sued by the idiot that pointed a gun at him

[Apeman]

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

Only in this country can you be sued for defending yourself from someone pointing a gun at you. Even with all the leftist bullshit I can't believe that someone is able to sue for damages after testifying in court that he ponted a gun at someone and was then shot for doing so.

 

[Bigfoot]

Too bad Gaige didn't get his face shot off instead of his arm.

I know that's beside the point but I'm just saying.

 

[Dr. Evil]

They just want Kyle to...



Hope Kyle counter sues the shit out of this scumbag.

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[spat]

They just want Kyle to...

View attachment 191467

Hope Kyle counter sues the shit out of this scumbag.

If a lawsuit is ruled frivolous, you should be able to sue the opposing attorneys who brought it too.

That would cut down on a lot of bullshit if they were on the hook.

 

[Apeman]

If a lawsuit is ruled frivolous, you should be able to sue the opposing attorneys who brought it too.

That would cut down on a lot of bullshit if they were on the hook.

And the lawyer that brought the suit should be disbarred

 

[Saltwater60]

He’s a criminal cocksucking scum.

 

[repete]

Just goes to reinforce the fact that dead men can't sue you!

 

[Acer-m14]

Just goes to reinforce the fact that dead men can't sue you!

there families can

 

[spat]

there families can

In theory it's for lost future earnings.

You would have to convince a jury that Loser McDumpsterfire was going to become a millionaire to get much.

 

[Saltwater60]

there families can

They generally get less than the injured does.

 

[repete]

there families can

I never said anything about family.

 

[Deplorable Me]

In theory it's for lost future earnings.

You would have to convince a jury that Loser McDumpsterfire was going to become a millionaire to get much.

With the government handouts, quite possibly.

 

[Hillbilly77]

If a lawsuit is ruled frivolous, you should be able to sue the opposing attorneys who brought it too.

You spelled “hang” wrong.

 

[Jmac00]

WELL, Mr. Dumbass, with the illegal gun, has changed his story. I suspect when you testify UNDER OATH that you admit to being shot AFTER YOU POINT YOUR ILLEGAL GUN at the defendant, and then change your story for a money grab, its going to get toss on the merits alone. And if Rittenhouse's lawyer has a single brain cell, he WILL COUNTER SUE for perjury

Grosskreutz ran toward Rittenhouse on Aug. 25, 2020, after the teen fatally shot two people.

“He approached with his hands in the air to try to ease the situation and stop the killing,” the suit reads. “Defendant Rittenhouse instead shot Mr. Grosskreutz in the bicep, leaving a gaping wound.” < ut-ooh this is a total lie, according to his own testimony>

Grosskreutz said something different when he was under oath during Rittenhouse’s trial.

He agreed then that Rittenhouse didn’t fire at him until he pointed his gun at the teen.

“It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun … that he fired, right?” Corey Chirafisi, part of Rittenhouse’s defense team, asked Grosskreutz.

“Correct,” Grosskreutz replied.

In media interviews after the testimony, Grosskreutz tried to walk back that acknowledgment.

“I do believe that in that photo, given the right narrative, one could suggest that yes, I was pointing my weapon at the defendant. But when you play it as a movie or look at different stills, my arm was being vaporized as I was allegedly pointing my weapon at the defendant,” he told ABC. “It’s completely inconsistent with the physiology of my wound that he would have shot me while my weapon was pointed at his head.”

I have a feeling this is going to end badly for Mr. Dumbass

 

[spat]

WELL, Mr. Dumbass, with the illegal gun, has changed his story. I suspect when you testify UNDER OATH that you admit to being shot AFTER YOU POINT YOUR ILLEGAL GUN at the defendant, and then change your story for a money grab, its going to get toss on the merits alone. And if Rittenhouse's lawyer has a single brain cell, he WILL COUNTER SUE for perjury



I have a feeling this is going to end badly for Mr. Dumbass

Perjury isn't something you can sue for. It's a criminal charge not a civil one.

Rittenhouse could sue him for a lot of things, but that isn't one of them.

Unfortunately even just the emotional distress suit would be worth more than you could ever get out of him. He's what they call "judgement proof". I.e. You can't get blood from a stone.

Rittenhouse could win a billion dollar judgement against him and he'd be luck to recover enough to pay for parking during the trial.

 

[alistair]

There was a lot of talk about Rittenhouse suing the press, tv channels, Biden etc
Has anyone heard if he if following through with these suits?

 

[DoOver]

 

[Acer-m14]

so the dumbass with the illegal gun .. he has committed crime .. he can't sue .. that would be making $$$ from a crime

 

[Uninformed and Compliant]

not much of a report, but here it is.

The View Settles With The Rittenhouses For $22 Million and a Formal Apology - Daily Trendings

ABC’s The View will compose a written apology to Kyle Rittenhouse and his mother, Wendy Rittenhouse, and deliver it along with a check for $22 million. The Rittenhouse’s spokesman, Joe Barron, says the settlement didn’t take long and “wasn’t very difficult.” Apparently, the show’s producers have...

sharelaganee.com

This is a fake story from several months ago.



...should probably provide a clue.

 

[dwa12479]

Grosskreutz told the prosecution team during the trial that he had his hands raised as he closed in on Rittenhouse and didn't intend to shoot the teenager when he pointed the gun at him.

Clown.

 

[Steal2B]

 

[kev74]

Hit and run? Maybe someone recognized him and his gimpy arm.

 

[Acer-m14]

what hit and Run ..

i did not see anyone running in that video ..

 

[Steal2B]

 

[dwa12479]

Still a fucking clown.

 

[GOYABEAN]