FBI concludes Alec Baldwin pulled trigger in Halyna Hutchins shooting on movie set

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
51,674
Reaction score
140,365
Location
livingston county
An FBI analysis shows that the hammer to the gun that shot and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins had to have been fully cocked and the trigger pulled for it to fire.

According to an FBI analysis, Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger of the gun that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounded director Joel Souza on the New Mexico set of the movie Rust on October 21, 2021.


thepostmillennial.com

BREAKING: FBI concludes Alec Baldwin pulled trigger in Halyna Hutchins shooting on movie set

An FBI analysis shows that the hammer to the gun that shot and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins had to have been fully cocked and the trigger pulled for it to fire.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
 
Jmac00

Jmac00

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
18,846
Reaction score
51,805
Location
somewhere in America
everyone's first question should be

How did live ammo get on the set? We all have seen movies where tens of thousands of rounds are shot, and no one is hurt or killed. John Wick, comes to mind.

another question, Did Baldwin know Hutchins was working on a movie about child trafficking? oddly Congresswoman Walorski was working with Anne Heche on the child sex trade in hollywood. So far it seems odd or coincidental that all three are dead.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,675
Reaction score
64,960
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
livingston said:
An FBI analysis shows that the hammer to the gun that shot and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins had to have been fully cocked and the trigger pulled for it to fire.

According to an FBI analysis, Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger of the gun that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounded director Joel Souza on the New Mexico set of the movie Rust on October 21, 2021.


thepostmillennial.com

BREAKING: FBI concludes Alec Baldwin pulled trigger in Halyna Hutchins shooting on movie set

An FBI analysis shows that the hammer to the gun that shot and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins had to have been fully cocked and the trigger pulled for it to fire.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
Click to expand...
With the current reputation of the FBI, this may count in favor of Baldwin.


Was there a grassy knoll on set ?


OfC Baldwin is such a shitweasel anyway. Maybe he was about to take the shot and the FBI sniper got her first LOL.
 
M

ManualF150

.308 Win
Messages
4,836
Reaction score
8,835
Location
Cayuga
So when is this Mr. Baldwin going to get the death sentence?

After all, he lied on numerous accounts, and he did shoot an innocent young women to death.
 
1911guy

1911guy

6.5 Creedmoor
In Memoriam
U.S. Military
Messages
1,841
Reaction score
2,364
Location
Oneida County
The only other way that gun could have gone bang is for Baldwin to simultaneously thumb back the hammer while squeezing the trigger. I have seen many people do that without them realizing it. Just relaxing the thumb would create a discharge.
 
tgenec86

tgenec86

.357 mag
Messages
656
Reaction score
1,688
Location
Utica, NY
"No Shit, Sherlock"... It's blatantly obvious from day one that Baldwin pulled the trigger. As is stunningly obvious - and demonstrated by countless AR owners who leave their rifles unsupervised for periods of time - guns don't fire themselves. And pretty much everyone on the set knew Baldwin was holding the pistol. This is news how?

Yes - he lied his ass off. He's a far left liberal who would have the 2A abolished and believes only the Police, The Government, and he and his personal bodyguards should have guns - and is on record many, many times for spewing his rhetoric. His automatic, default position would have been one of obfuscation, confusion, contradiction, and dissembling - claiming his innocence and how he'd "NEVER" handle a firearm unsafely. Well, the pigeons have come home to roost. He's not special, he's not careful, he doesn't know the cardinal rule of gun safety - he's just another loud mouthed hypocrite.

What genuinely sucks for Baldwin (yes - really) is that he should never have been in that position to begin with. Modern movies have guns. Love stories, children's movies, comedies, thrillers - they ALL HAVE GUNS. In the movies, you point guns at people, you can't fake it. The guns aren't supposed to fire real bullets, and millions of rounds of "gunfire" are captured on camera every year with no one actually getting shot. Every movie set has a prop master responsible for the guns, and this one totally fucked it up. I would hope that the actor would have the good sense to double check the "prop" gun, but that might even be going too far since the variety of weapons that go through the actors hands these days would require they practically be combat weapons masters just to know how they all function. Point being, when an actor with the Hollywood reputation that Baldwin has shows up, the production crew is pretty much expected to be top tier. Be honest - if you had decades of experience in acting (NOT SHOOTING GUNS IN REAL LIFE) and had been handed a pistol - hundreds of times - to use in a scene by the prop crew, do you really think you'd question it? Do you question your IT department when they issue you a thumb drive as to whether or not it has a Trojan embedded in it? Keanu Reeves might actually do so, but reportedly he's a 3-Gun competitor and has the experience to question things. Don't get your undies in a wad, I'm not giving Baldwin an out or an excuse, but I am saying that guns in movies are so commonplace that they have become just another piece of the scenery and someone who likely rarely shoots in real life "just knows" it's a prop and not something to worry about. I know that sounds wrong to any of you that shoot and hunt, but how many Hollywood liberals do you think have? Hell, most probably couldn't even load a gun without having to study it for 10 minutes. We hear and remind ourselves of the cardinal rules all the time - they likely have never even heard them.

Point being - Baldwin is guilty of involuntary manslaughter. He's also guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice. He's definitely guilty of being an opinionated, hypocritical asshole, but can't be convicted of that, unfortunately.

Now - throw in the trafficking / assassination theory? Interesting - but does anyone think Baldwin has the balls to actually put his own life and livelihood at risk, even with a threat from the Clintons? I think he's too big of a gutless coward. Could it have been a set-up? Weirder things have happened.
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,976
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Livingston
Baldwin didn't pull the trigger per say .. it was pulled back before his butter thumb pulled the hammer back ..

holdover said:
And it only took nearly a year long investigation.
Click to expand...

FBI investigation .. not the ATF gun rules makers lol ..

click play .. trust me only a year .. and in minuets can be proven ..

 
zorro

zorro

.44 mag
Messages
840
Reaction score
1,403
Location
Usa
And he will not spend 1 minute in jail………simply too connected
 
FP1201

FP1201

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,021
Reaction score
11,599
Location
Adams, NY
Jmac00 said:
everyone's first question should be

How did live ammo get on the set? We all have seen movies where tens of thousands of rounds are shot, and no one is hurt or killed. John Wick, comes to mind.

another question, Did Baldwin know Hutchins was working on a movie about child trafficking? oddly Congresswoman Walorski was working with Anne Heche on the child sex trade in hollywood. So far it seems odd or coincidental that all three are dead.
Click to expand...
That is the real question: The Person in charge of Props and a second person should have verified the gun and ammunition when issued.
I don't like Baldwin as a person, however when you're doing Film/acting/Stage/Theater there has to be an expectation that the scene has been made safe, after all it's not "real life", and if you're doing a shoot-out, then you're going to be shooting at people you really don't intend on killing.
IF Baldwin held the trigger back while "fanning" the Hammer on a quick draw, then yes it would have gone off without "pulling the trigger".
I hadn't heard the woman killed was working on child trafficking but if so, she'd have a target pasted right on... give the depravity, heniousness and exposure to the World of someone involved in child trafficking, I can see where any lengths, including calculated murder would be used to hide the crimes.
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,264
Reaction score
16,201
Location
Rochester
Why has no one considered an obvious question:

FP1201 said:
I hadn't heard the woman killed was working on child trafficking but if so, she'd have a target pasted right on...
Click to expand...

This would imply that Alec was in on her assassination.

There's no guarantee that the gun would have been aimed directly at her, unless he was in on it.
 
FP1201

FP1201

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,021
Reaction score
11,599
Location
Adams, NY
Grimscale said:
Why has no one considered an obvious question:



This would imply that Alec was in on her assassination.

There's no guarantee that the gun would have been aimed directly at her, unless he was in on it.
Click to expand...
Very much a possibility, and remembering he's a Professional Actor it's tough to judge his actions afterwards as culpability.
Word has it this Satanic Cabal that feed on Children and debauchery "corner" it's members with acts in such a way that "If I go down, you go down too". Evil begets evil and has no bounds, therefor it must be eradicated with extreme prejudice... Let God sort it out by express delivery.
 
Z

Zerex

.308 Win
Messages
3,385
Reaction score
2,647
Location
Rome, NY
FBI may have been there watching Hutchins, and planned it all............and simultaneously watching Heche, and finally got both Heche and Walorsk too.

Big dicks involved here, and the FBI is a dick ridden org. signs of relief in DC now.

"Coincidence"????, as there is generally no such thing when a common fact is involved.
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,976
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Livingston
zorro said:
So looks as though Baldwin is on his way to being charged :cowboy2:

www.cbsnews.com

Up to 4 people, including Alec Baldwin, might end up facing charges in "Rust" shooting, district attorney says in request for more money to investigate

District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies made an emergency funding request for $635,500 to continue to pay for the investigation into the case.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

What a shame …………:ROFL::ROFL::ROFL::ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:
Click to expand...

what the hell is this emergency funding BS .. arrest them .. bail 1.2 mil .. they post bail there is your damn funding ..
 
zorro

zorro

.44 mag
Messages
840
Reaction score
1,403
Location
Usa
Honestly I don’t care what or how much the emergency funding is……….so long as it results in Baldwin being charged and ending up behind bars :rock:
 
Far king

Far king

.357 mag
Messages
563
Reaction score
1,039
Location
Barneveld ny
MothMan said:
IMO, he might not have any recollection of touching a sensitive SA trigger. Do believe he caused gun to fire. :hookah:
Click to expand...
Of course he pulled the trigger and that is undeniable but here are a couple of details that l think are important.
The first thing is that gun was not supposed to be fired in the scene that was being filmed , so Baldwin fucked up and that one is on him . How a live round was in the guns cylinder is another discussion.
Now what really strikes me is how Baldwin has not once owned any of his actions. He denied ever pulling the trigger, the gun just “went off “ by itself.
This is so telling to me, the man is of extremely weak character and will lie and deceive to save is own stinkin skin.
If he had any integrity he would have admitted he pulled the trigger by accident but had not loaded a lethal round in the prop gun which was the armorers responsibility .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top