maverick52
.223 Rem
That’s a good question. But I think 30 days is more than reasonable. If I were the applicants I would apply for relief again next month
Temporary Restaining Order Issued For Concealed Carry Improvement Act (merged thread)
- Thread starter Glock_USA
- Start date
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
Being a New Yorker I now know what it feels like to be locked in steerage on the Titanic. Second class citizen on a ship of fools.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Good news...
Like saying a severe reaction to the clot shot means it's working.
Like saying a severe reaction to the clot shot means it's working.
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
I just had to watch this one.....LOL
CaliberPlus
.45 acp
There is a thread on that steaming pile already.
cranberry
9mm
I goggled reasonable time frame and it says the standard is from 48 hours to 10 calendar days so we'll see .
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Oh, sorry, i didn`t know.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
I'm thinking SCOTUS wants the 2nd to bend the knee.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
While the court on Wednesday let a New York handgun restriction stand pending further legal action, Alito essentially said the challengers should remain vigilant and keep the pressure on the courts.
"Applicants should not be deterred by today's order from again seeking relief" if the appeals court doesn't move swiftly or explain its actions, Alito wrote, joined by Thomas, in a statement issued with the Supreme Court's order.
ManualF150
.308 Win
I have a fee
The way I look at it, I would rather a well-formed and strong appeal so it makes it very difficult for NY to try to weasel in anything after a decision in our favor has been made. Sometimes this does take time.
Going back to my first statement... it's like what one does to take their time to work on something, but makes one party happy for now till they get it finalized, then the real deal is out. I have to do this occasionally at work... it's a true PITA, but it's more of a mind game than anything. I also do this when I need to make an resounding NO... I make it look like I had a long hard thinking session about it, versus just saying NO from the get go... like a stall tactic.
Maybe I got too much hope? I try to be positive.......
I have a feeling some gears are turning in the background to make it look like they are working on it.
The way I look at it, I would rather a well-formed and strong appeal so it makes it very difficult for NY to try to weasel in anything after a decision in our favor has been made. Sometimes this does take time.
Going back to my first statement... it's like what one does to take their time to work on something, but makes one party happy for now till they get it finalized, then the real deal is out. I have to do this occasionally at work... it's a true PITA, but it's more of a mind game than anything. I also do this when I need to make an resounding NO... I make it look like I had a long hard thinking session about it, versus just saying NO from the get go... like a stall tactic.
Maybe I got too much hope? I try to be positive.......
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
They need to rile up their base so that the left is ok with packing the Supreme Court or over ruling the Bruen decision.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I doubt the Supreme Court is googling that or that they care about what google says.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Granting our stay would not have interfered with any of your thoughts here. The stay should have been granted.
ManualF150
.308 Win
Oh, trust me, I totally agree.
We have a younger women at work, lives alone in a sketchy area, and used to legally CCW as unrestricted since she was 22, now she won't because of the CCIA. I tried telling her that she needs to just carry anyways before she gets raped, but she doesn't feel comfortable. I don't know what else to do... she doesn't want to break any laws.
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
No....trust ME....ive been carrying 24/7 legally with an UNRESTRICTED CCW since 1989....no one feels less comfortable than me going ANYWHERE without my sidearm on my right hip. The majority of ppl with permits in this state have been unaffected by the CCIA because they've held hunting/target permits since day 1....
Wat?
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Wat?
My point is that prior to the CCIA, ppl with restricted permits technically weren't allowed to carry in most places....while not illegal, they did risk, at the discretion of the issuing authority, of having their permits revoked if found to be carrying in most areas. Ive never agreed with it....im just sayin....Wat?
The Bruen decision and the CCIA deal with the law. Restrictions have nothing to do with the law.
They were never "technically" not allowed to.
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
I think most ppl understand exactly what I said my friend. Its been common knowledge for years that issuing authorities have had the power to revoke permits of restricted permit holders if found carrying in places other than the range and hunting....to and from....etc...
Yes, that's been the unsubstantiated rumor for years.
They also have the power to revoke permits for any other reason.
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Reread my post....I specifically said "while not illegal..."
And then you ruined it with "technically not allowed", which of course isn't true.
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Lol
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Are you a CCW holder and if so, was it restricted prior to Bruen?
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Are you a CCW holder and if so.....was it restricted prior to Bruen?
maverick52
.223 Rem
This is true. But the risk was having your permit revoked. Not the end of the world and could fight it in court. Now it’s a class d felony. That’s a risk few are willing to take. That’s what makes this law so egregious. If the penalty was something like a fine we wouldn’t even be talking about it. But a felony is over the top bullshit.
That question is both irrelevant, as this thread is not about me, and based on a false pretense, as Bruen changed nothing in the law relating to "restrictions" as "restrictions" are not mentioned in the law.
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
I agree with you 100%
GlockModel29
.40 S&W
U pretty much echoed what I said previously regarding revocation....