The New York State Police are watching your social media

[Tisto]

Maybe don't sugar coat it next time.

You want me to get banned again ?

 

[SonOfSun]

I have no expectations otherwise. I only said it was wrong, not illegal. I simply applied my own definition and what i thought of it. My mistake was in doing it as a reply to you, which invited your exaggerated, assumptive response. Seems I struck a nerve...actually I think this whole thread did.

I can also see how most boot-lickers would agree that the way the .gov spends the money it takes from the people is irrelevant.

Imagine being so entitled that you feel the government shouldn't look at things posted in public places, and that it's wrong for them to do so.

 

[thughes]

I know a few troopers personally and I am monitoring thier social media......

 

[Drinkthekoolaid]

Everyone on this forum is already likely on multiple lists. Keep things in perspective. Just saying

 

[libertysnake]

 

[gunpoliticsny]

Everyone on this forum is already likely on multiple lists. Keep things in perspective. Just saying

 

[Defilade]

Kind of along the lines of Sobriety check points. Let's make everyone stop to ok your pass. Illegal and fuck you!

 

[Saltwater60]

If they used social media to monitor the BLM we’re all safe and you could seemingly say anything you want and they would never find you. They failed miserably at stopping or arresting any of the BLM rioters.

 

[SonOfSun]

This is why they do it:

3 Active-Duty Marines Who Work in Intelligence Arrested for Alleged Participation in Jan. 6 Riot | Military.com

www.military.com

According to the complaint filed by federal prosecutors, investigators first learned of the three men when they found photos from inside the Capitol that Coomer had posted on Instagram including "the caption 'Glad to be apart [sic] of history.'" A search warrant was issued for his social media accounts in August 2021.​

They catch people who post about their crimes online. If you don't want the government to see it, don't post it publicly, and even better don't use third party services to talk about your crimes, lol.

 

[spat]

It's not surveillance if you post it on a public platform.

Surveillance in public is still Surveillance.

It's just not illegal Surveillance.

Unless it crosses the line into "having a chilling effect on free speech", in that case SCOTUS has ruled it is a violation of your rights, and that *would* make it a crime.

Just like when a private company censors you on their platform, it is still censorship, even if it isn't illegal or a 1st ammendment violation.

 

[spat]

That's all fine and good, but at the end of the day they're going to keep doing it because things put in public places aren't private and as such it's legal for them to do these things. Your agreement with them doing it (or not) is irrelevant.

Except, as taxpayers, they work for us.

Government shouldn't be doing things the public objects to, even if it isn't expressly forbidden.

 

[spat]

for what ?? .. Telling the Truth ..

That's the fastest way on those lists.

 

[spat]

Imagine being so entitled that you feel the government shouldn't look at things posted in public places, and that it's wrong for them to do so.

Imagine being so cucked that you think it's OK for government to do something the majority of the public finds distasteful.

 

[spat]

View attachment 187772

Jokes on them, using steganographic techniques, those mayonnaise slapping noises contain hundreds of great blueprints and recipes...

 

[SonOfSun]

Imagine being so cucked that you think it's OK for government to do something the majority of the public finds distasteful.

Never said I agree with it, though I also don't find people looking at things you post out in public spaces that alarming. Presumably if you didn't intend for anyone that wants to read it to be able to do so then you wouldn't have posted it there in the first place. If I post something in a public space online I assume the whole world can read it - individual people, companies, governments, etc. - anyone and everyone.

Whether anyone agrees with it or not doesn't matter. It's legal. They do it. Know that when you post things online in public spaces they read it. There was a saying a long time ago, it went like this: "I wish I wouldn't have said that". That was from the days before the Internet, but it was basically summing up people getting caught because they had to brag and couldn't keep their mouth shut.

Don't be this guy:

Video: Man flashes money on Facebook Live, gets arrested

A Florida man joyfully flashing money live on the internet got a sudden surprise when police officers barged in and arrested him for allegedly selling drugs

www.police1.com

 

[SonOfSun]

Surveillance in public is still Surveillance.

It's just not illegal Surveillance.

Unless it crosses the line into "having a chilling effect on free speech", in that case SCOTUS has ruled it is a violation of your rights, and that *would* make it a crime.

Just like when a private company censors you on their platform, it is still censorship, even if it isn't illegal or a 1st ammendment violation.

I agree with all of the above.

 

[SonOfSun]

Exactly. For political reasons.

They sure as hell don't do it to stop nutcases groomed by former agents from shooting up Tops grocery stores.

Typical lib playbook, trot out the outlier example to justify mass infringement.

Back on ignore...please do likewise.

Political reasons? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA

They were fucking criminals. They posted about it. They got caught because they were too damn retarded to keep their mouths shut... or in this case fingers off the keyboard.

Also, I don't ignore people, I'm not a no-will pussy that has to censor things they disagree with. Of course you are free to do whatever you want though.

 

[Steal2B]

Maybe Pushback is coming

NY leaders call on Madison Square Garden to stop using facial recognition tech: 'Sets a dangerous precedent'

While New York lawmakers are calling on Madison Square Garden to cease the use of facial recognition tech on fans, the company said it does not retain images of most individuals.

sports.yahoo.com

 

[pshift]

If they monitor social media, only one of two things will happen. Only the lazy will get caught or stupid people.

 

[libertysnake]

If they monitor social media, only one of two things will happen. Only the lazy will get caught or stupid people.

Given their track record of bringing stupid people to justice I guess that means most people shouldn't be worried.