(Note to Admin - if this thread goes too sideways, please delete)
Blurred lines: A pregnant man's tragedy tests gender notions
1) I noticed the strange way wording, pronouns and male/female are parsed better than Bubba Clinton.
2) the hospital personnel are implicitly blamed for this "tragedy" even though their records listed him as male and "he"..." ...appears masculine... " - in other words, the hospital actually classified this person as their preferred gender - male.
3) the "man" in question, while taking exogenous testosterone, but not recently, and obviously having had an aftermarket penis installed, was still able to conceive. Namely, they had the complete female plumbing to have sex, the wish to do so, and the hormonal wherewithal to conceive and carry the fetus to the point where there was a heartbeat.
4) it's the "...man's tragedy..."; the fetus appears to be cast aside as a "bug, not a feature" of this and is not even considered in the equation.
5) who's at fault here? It would appear the hospital will be the scapegoat.
6) we are in the abyss of a societal psychosis and this is just an illustrative example.
7) The fact that the fetus, who appears to have been developed enough to warrant an emergency C-section, is mentioned only in passing, both in reality and in the article, is a significant "tell". This speaks volumes about how deeply some people in this country are consumed by "The Sickness".
If you have children teach them well, keep them close and advise them wisely. Don't let the monsters of cultural Marxism destroy them.
Sorry for the rant.
Blurred lines: A pregnant man's tragedy tests gender notions
1) I noticed the strange way wording, pronouns and male/female are parsed better than Bubba Clinton.
2) the hospital personnel are implicitly blamed for this "tragedy" even though their records listed him as male and "he"..." ...appears masculine... " - in other words, the hospital actually classified this person as their preferred gender - male.
3) the "man" in question, while taking exogenous testosterone, but not recently, and obviously having had an aftermarket penis installed, was still able to conceive. Namely, they had the complete female plumbing to have sex, the wish to do so, and the hormonal wherewithal to conceive and carry the fetus to the point where there was a heartbeat.
4) it's the "...man's tragedy..."; the fetus appears to be cast aside as a "bug, not a feature" of this and is not even considered in the equation.
5) who's at fault here? It would appear the hospital will be the scapegoat.
6) we are in the abyss of a societal psychosis and this is just an illustrative example.
7) The fact that the fetus, who appears to have been developed enough to warrant an emergency C-section, is mentioned only in passing, both in reality and in the article, is a significant "tell". This speaks volumes about how deeply some people in this country are consumed by "The Sickness".
If you have children teach them well, keep them close and advise them wisely. Don't let the monsters of cultural Marxism destroy them.
Sorry for the rant.
Last edited:
