Bad idea. If we are allowing EOs to now dictate arms rights, then you might not like how the wind blows 4 years from now. I'd prefer the molasses slow congress to a yo-yo that goes back and forth.
While I don't like the guy, there is no evidence to support this. Just because his father was in rhe FBI doesn't mean anything of the sort. The FBI is fucking huge. Sometimes things are just coincidences.
I don't like it.
They'll take their own people back. Ok, they should do this.
They'll take other foreign nationals in for a fee. Yeah fuck that. Send those other foreign nationals back to their country of origin - and pay nothing. That's the route. Fuck paying a foreign government a fee...
Was watching some footage of deportations, and damn that's some funny and cold shit. The ICE officer asked the guy his name and a few other questions like where he was from ,etc. One of the questions was if he had ever been deported before. It went like this:
Ice Officer: Have you ever been...
Not a fan of that idea, I see a TON of potential for abuse that outweighs the potential good.
Civil asset forfeiture abuse comes to mind right off the top.
If you wake up every morning, scratch your balls and in your brain say to yourself "yup, I'm a woman", you have mental issues. You have a severe disconnection from reality. These are far from desirable traits for a military.
The last person I want having my back in a combat situation is...
I agree with their right to call themselves whatever they want. I disagree with their expectation that they get to decide what everyone else gets to call them too. They push their stupid pronoun shit and act like I'm the crazy one for not calling a dude in a dress a woman. They can fuck right...
Fun fact: In the original folk tale of Robin Hood, he was just killing and robbing the rich, and the people loved it! Over hundreds of years though, the monarchs adapted it first and made him a secret prince and the bad guy an illegitimate king, and his band of robbers became "merry men". Luigi...
I could have told you it wouldn't work, at least not their implementation. I'm not for or against wind/solar. They DO have valid applications. The problem is trying to force it for the sake of forcing it. Where it makes sense people will want it/pay for it. Where it doesn't they won't...
Affirmative action violates the equal protection clause. Should have been DOA day 1. I like all of Trump's EOs so far, minus the birthright citizenship, and that is more for legal reasons than ideological reasons.
I still don't think it will change anything. The current slate of justices seem unlikely to rule differently.
That being said, what if Trump knows that? Maybe it's a "sacrificial lamb" case. IE, make an executive order that he knows likely won't hold BUT will require litigation to hash...
Already litigated.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649
Facts of the case
The Chinese Exclusion Acts denied citizenship to Chinese immigrants. Moreover, by treaty no Chinese subject in the United States could become a naturalized citizen. Wong Kim Ark was born in San...
I'm pretty confident the under jurisdiction part is already being interpreted properly, based on how the law is written. For the record, I'd prefer that people illegally in the country that pop out a kid 3 days after illegally crossing the border does not result in the kid being a citizen of...
I'm skeptical of that working. We generally don't refine our own oil. We will still need oil from other parts of the world due to composition.
The U.S. exports more petroleum than it imports. So why are we importing at all...
That's not in the text.
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or...