nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Guess you also believe white people today are to blame for slavery too!
Guess you also believe white people today are to blame for slavery too!
Since the NRA paid the freight on the Bruen/NYSRPA case, they ought to get a pass from now on.
But you can get a Sticker for the back of your truck!Lmfao.. fuck the NRA.. I cannot wait until they are finally dissolved 100% and are nothing more than a shit stain of a memory
But you can get a Sticker for the back of your truck!
But you can get a Sticker for the back of your truck!
Or just picking up the 2 million dollar tab for Bruen, but some just need a dog to kick! Carry on....
Did I read that right? I post agreement with a well-informed, well-respected member and I get dressed down? Did that just happen? I guess maybe I’m the low hanging fruit.So be it...here goes.
Not sure but it sounds like you're defending the NRA - the same organization that was modeled after the British National Rifle Association – I mean, you can read the tea leaves. It’s only a matter of time before our LEOs have rape whistles and billy clubs to control the street thugs. Today’s NRA is a shadow of its former self and not what our fathers or grand-fathers grew up supporting.
The same group that whiffed at the ’68 GCA, Brady Act, ’94 AWB, State-level AWB after sunset, unSafe Act (what else am I missing? Ghost guns? What else?) and currently appear to be Not Really Active? The only docket I see them on is as the Respondent.
The same group that gave FUKH an “A” rating? And an endorsement?
Don’t misread me, I’m not giving King overdue credit (or any at all), but in light of Bruen I felt it only right to include NYSRPA in my comment to edwardteach. Who knows, every once in a while the inmates run the asylum, doesn't matter, we won - this battle. We all know NYSRPA has struck out before, but this time they hit it and I’m not looking a gift horse in the mouth, nor am I paying the NRA credit. The credit really belongs to Clement, Murphy and SCOTUS – I suppose also to Underwood for sucking as bad as she did.
Frankly, their affiliation is akin something like the American Cancer Society to the United Way, in which the UW is the fund-raising hub that tosses pennies to charities it’s affiliated with. NYSRPA is no more the NRA than the ACS is the United Way. They have working relationships together because they are bound by common causes. At the end of the day they are still independent organizations. From the NRA website:
“State Associations are independent organizations affiliated with and recognized by the NRA. Your NRA membership does not include membership in your State Association.”
As far as I can see the NRA’s legal involvement was nil and I have found nothing about financing, they were mentioned only twice in the syllabus - once in Breyer’s dissenting opinion and once in a footnote and not at all in the filings. I’m no lawyer, but I would imagine if there was an undue amount of legal or financial support directly from another agency or organization it would need to be disclosed. I would expect them to be mentioned a bit more in the filing and the judgment.
I'm not sure what the point was about state affiliates anyway, 2A rights are supposed to cross state borders, right?
If I misread you, I sincerely apologize, but I stated the reason for my opinion.
Agree 100%. We have two examples from NYS of pro-gun legislators when they were local nobodies. But as soon as they become statewide or get national recognition they quickly change their position. Typical lying politicians. Tar and feathers are appropriate in my opinion.She's a politician, she held no views, she only held whatever public policy position was politically expedient at the time.
This hasn't been just an about face, it's been the mother of all about faces. Lobbyists that take donations for the purpose of fighting for our rights have a duty to see through pols lies in much the same way that Republican have (or should have) a duty to see through RINOs. That's a high bar, I'll concede that, but No democrat deserves an "A" from the NRA, ever.
You have, and Ive been guilty of feeling hopeless at times, but not perpetually hopeless. I am more often optimistic than pessimistic, and with the Bruen decision I am even more optimistic.I've said it many times in the last year, NY has done a good job gaining help from gun owners by conditioning them to this mentality
Hopeful yes but be realistic. Look at the growing population of this state. City rats that only vote to get more free shit. The left will control this state for a long time.You have, and Ive been guilty of feeling hopeless at times, but not perpetually hopeless. I am more often optimistic than pessimistic, and with the Bruen decision I am even more optimistic.
My hope is that the key lawsuits will be successful (aw bans, mag restrictions, and new permitting laws to all be struck down), and that the left will push too hard in response and lose their grip on the state, and its people.
I consider myself a realist, leaning to the optimistic side of things (mostof the time). Youre right, but being hopeful with our 2a rights is something I think we can all be hopeful about. I believe the left is going to resist hard against court rulings and that will force more people to choose a side. If we get court rulings that deem aw bans, mag capacity bans, etc as unconstitutional then it will close many doors on the leftist agenda of disarming us. The more court rulings in our favor the more desperate and aggressive/careless the left will get.Hopeful yes but be realistic. Look at the growing population of this state. City rats that only vote to get more free shit. The left will control this state for a long time.
If they get an injunction, the district court judge can block all of it and make the guidelines NYS had to follow . The 2nd circuit will rule on that judge’s ruling later.I am so happy I could cry. At age 74, I have lived long enough at age 74, to see justice begin to be served.
Many, many of my late friends, must be happy, where ever they are.
The 2nd Circuit Ct has yet to release the SCOTUS rules, that NYS has to follow.................so, these lawsuits may be moot after that happens, or the 2nd says FU to SCOTUS yet again.
NYS will say FU again and again, in any case, as Communists cannot institutie the taking of your gas and wood stoves, and guns, to establish social justice reparations, that we are responsible for preventing, because of the 2nd amendments intentions--- of creating fear, in any and all, deep state creatures..
I suspect that the lawsuits will have be refiled again and again, in the game of legal chess, that the degenerate bitch and Amy Schumers uncle ,are going to try to play, using ignorant aunt Jemima.
The semi auto rifle license probably will be upheld.I hope NYSRPA is taking on the "law" (A10503) which requires a license for a semi rifle and the "law" (S4970A) which has huge overreach on any person walking into a gun store. I have mostly heard about the justified outrage against the handgun permit business.
The semi auto rifle license probably will be upheld.
Most of new handgun laws won’t . The body armor law won’t survive the court challenge either.
Based on the concurrent opinion of Bruen, yes, it will survive if it’s at a shall issue standard.You think the body armor challange will fail Bruen but the semi auto rifle license won't hahahahhahahhahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahhahahahahahahahhahaha
Based on the concurrent opinion of Bruen, yes, it will survive if it’s at a shall issue standard.
The body armor challenge is less of a Bruen case but more of a case of Caetano v. Massachusetts.
Go read the concurrent opinions. Ha, ha, ha( not really funny at all) . It will have the same weight if not more in what the lower courts are going to do. The shall issue system will survive any court challenge as a result.Lmfao tell me you don't know what bruen says without telling me you don't know what bruen says
Hahahahhahahahahahahhaahhahaa
Go read the concurrent opinions. Ha, ha, ha( not really funny at all) . It will have the same weight if not more in what the lower courts are going to do. The shall issue system will survive any court challenge as a result.
Edward, I do know what I am talking about. I wish I was wrong. A real “ shall issue “ system will surviveYea go read all the opinion, not just cherry pick small parts hear and there. Otherwise stfu
Hahahhahahahahhahaa sHalL issue SyStEm WiLl sUrViVe AnY cOuRt
Again tell me you don't know fucking shit about the bruen decision without saying you don't know fucking shit about the bruen decision
Edward, I do know what I am talking about. I wish I was wrong. A real “ shall issue “ system will survive
Speculation aside, is there any info about law suits against this crap that anyone has seen? I know what I believe SHOULD happen but so far that is not happening. This state does not seem to care about the SC, law, even the state constitution. Meanwhile time is ticking along to 9/6.
Sorry, wrong thread, bouncing around.
There is also no word from the 2nd Circuit Court vie the Federal District Court, sense NY has shown it's hand the Court *MAY* look at that also.Sorry, wrong thread, bouncing around. My last statement fits this thread well, though.
They used the vaunted "Message of Necessity". The NYS Legislature equivalent of "Go directly to 'GO', collect $200, and instantly own Boardwalk and Park Place".I am very curious, supposedly the bills passed 7/2 are against the state constitution as they went thru in 24 hours rather than the minimum 72 hours. If those could be taken off the table it would relieve some of my stress level. I heard tell courts were on vacation.