Air Force Responsible For Mass Shooting!!!

[pshift]

I'm at odds here since they should have done their job. Thoughts?

Judge rules Air Force responsible for 2017 mass shooting at Texas church | TheHill

 

[JamieZ]

They should of done their due diligence but they are far from being responsible.

My guns shouldnt be taken away because some mental case decided to shoot up Sandy Hook. I wasnt responsible for his actions.

Just like the Air Force isnt responsible for his actions

 

[Celt]

Absurd logic. The miners that mined the ore that the gun was made from are responsible with that logic. For that matter, the company that made the mining equipment, the owner of the mining land and whoever issued the contract to mine the raw materials that go into making firearms and ammunitiin all share responsibility.

 

[@thewheels]

If it wasn't guns, he could have done a dozen different things to the folks in that church. And most cheaper than guns and ammo.

 

[Blimey]

U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez for the Western District of Texas ruled that Kelley was 40 percent responsible for the shooting while the U.S. government was 60 percent responsible.

This is retarded.

 

[FP1201]

Gotta blame someone, and that someone will have money, else they won't be "held accountable".

 

[Dr. Evil]

Wait, I thought the gun was the violent one.

 

[Robin]

It's Eves' fault. I think her last name may have been Trump.
Robin

 

[tirwin1]

The govt is responsible so the families of the victims can sue no doubt.

 

[jimc]

I'm pretty sure the shooter is 'mostly responsible'.

 

[pshift]

As usual, the lawyers always file suit against those with the deepest pockets. Disgusting, IMHO. They can use this case to improve the system, rather than making it irrelevant (maybe too late for that, I guess).

 

[GOPerfect]

The shooter was 100% to blame and the Air Force 0%. Yep, 0% is still a percent.

 

[Modean]

The shooter is, of course, responsible for what he did. That said, the wing nut was able to legally buy a firearm as a prohibited person because the AF failed to report his conviction and BCD. Seems to me they were negligent.

 

[Modean]

I'm at odds here since they should have done their job. Thoughts?

Judge rules Air Force responsible for 2017 mass shooting at Texas church | TheHill

Not 60% responsible, but not zero either.

 

[SomeSoldier]

What % was the gun responsible and the manufacturer? What about the ammo and ammo manufacturer? When is the automobile manufacturer going to be held responsible? That car should known his intent and not started.

 

[spat]

Not 60% responsible, but not zero either.

0%

There shouldn't even be someplace for them to report him to.


If he was deemed too dangerous to own a gun (by virtue of conviction for a suitable crime by a jury), then he shouldn't have been walking free.

Anything besides incarceration isn't "prohibited from owning a gun" it is "asked nicely not to own a gun". They can pretend what they want, all that BS is at best a suggestion.

 

[GOPerfect]

The shooter is, of course, responsible for what he did. That said, the wing nut was able to legally buy a firearm as a prohibited person because the AF failed to report his conviction and BCD. Seems to me they were negligent.

No free American should be banned from owning a firearm.

 

[SomeSoldier]

No free American should be banned from owning a firearm.

This, either we follow the Constitution as it reads or we don't. Law is black and white, there is no grey despite how badly people want to twist it in their favor.