meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
and ,, these too LMAO
I didn't know they made the Pakistani version.
Black Rifles screwed it all up.
- Thread starter Diesel Tech
- Start date
- Status
I didn't know they made the Pakistani version.
IrishMick
.44 mag
No way Acer! That unicorn face doubles as a deadly vertical fore grip! That rifle must be banned....or at least registered and heavily restricted!
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
Guess I gotta agree there, mine are camo. When I get a chance I'm going to respray them 4 color woodland camo with proper CARC paint.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
It'd be nice if just ONE time absolutely no one responded to this obvious troll. But alas people still answer as if he's serious giving it the satisfaction SMH.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
@Diesel Tech
You realize that the goal is not black rifles. It’s all rifles. They have admitted to wanting Australian style gun laws where you even have to show a need to own a bolt action for hunting. You aren’t a hunter. You don’t get a license to own a bolt action. They start with black rifles first.
But why the hell am I waiting my time? This post isn’t for you. It’s for others.
You realize that the goal is not black rifles. It’s all rifles. They have admitted to wanting Australian style gun laws where you even have to show a need to own a bolt action for hunting. You aren’t a hunter. You don’t get a license to own a bolt action. They start with black rifles first.
But why the hell am I waiting my time? This post isn’t for you. It’s for others.
Hillbilly77
6.5 Creedmoor
"I can has a shot-gun for muh tur-kee huntin' and a rifle fer dem deers.
......Just like my gran-pa."
For the love of God.....
Why hasn't this troll been banned yet?
......Just like my gran-pa."
For the love of God.....
Why hasn't this troll been banned yet?
Depick
.308 Win
dwa12479
.338 Win Mag
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I really don't understand your issue. I bolded a part of your text. Fudds who want a pump gun for duck hunting or a bolt gun to kill deer are not under any more threat now than they were a while back. Because the gun owners you hate lead the vanguard against gun restrictions. Without the black rifle guys your grandfather will be next, with FUDDs next on the plate, like they have been in other countries.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
DT, You don't see the irony and contradiction in your posting?
Robin
Robin
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
O, Canada
Modean
.223 Rem
Fudd, troll, or both? You decide.
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Funny how violent crime rates are dropping while ar15 ownership goes up.
Anti gun laws, or citizen control laws, have been around forever. But the worst of the restrictions started over 100 years ago.
The left became brazen and emboldened as soon as nobama took office, thats when the latest anti gun push started again.
Once again, you are blaming the wrong people. Blame the wack left for stealing our rights, not the people who are embracing and defending them. @John Stark , you gotta get a load of this guy.
But, in reality, everything ive said here is for myself, because you are a FUDD and YOU are the 2nd Amendments biggest enemy.
Anti gun laws, or citizen control laws, have been around forever. But the worst of the restrictions started over 100 years ago.
The left became brazen and emboldened as soon as nobama took office, thats when the latest anti gun push started again.
Once again, you are blaming the wrong people. Blame the wack left for stealing our rights, not the people who are embracing and defending them. @John Stark , you gotta get a load of this guy.
But, in reality, everything ive said here is for myself, because you are a FUDD and YOU are the 2nd Amendments biggest enemy.
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
Has DildoTech posted anything other than anti gun rantings? I'm sure he's nothing but a Democrat Underground Troll. Didn't some guys from here sign up there to see what would happen?
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Trolling - Wikipedia
"In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement or a specific gain. "
Because Rights are Rights. Even if you think the other person's opinion is complete balderdash, they have the Right to speak it.
They do not, however, have the Right to force you to listen to it or abide by it.
The best advice is to simply laugh at this brazen attempt to support the destruction of our Rights and move on.
Paxal
.223 Rem
It’s funny because its stupid.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
@Diesel Tech
All opinions are welcome but expect some recoil. Some aspects I can understand because of all the stupid tacicool nonsense and also a few irresponsible people doing stupid things no matter what. We cannot control everyone.
But in the end this is the reality:
if law enforcement need any kind of gun, then, the otherwise defenseless citizens need those too for the very same reasons.
Otherwise we make privileged groups of people based on this and that and who knows what and that is against all the fundamental rights this nation was founded upon.
People are being murdered in gun free zones because they are not true gun free zones but pretending gun free zones like for example a school campus or a church vs. an airport secured perimeter after you go through a scanner and metal detector and you are inside a secured perimeter.
In Israel you have lots of those because of the security situation and they do work so the thugs and terrorists have opted for running people over with cars or trucks.
I hope you are not suggesting people should be defenseless or in an inferior position like they do not deserve to be able to preserve their own safety and lives or should be fine with less security.
That is what some anti-gun crazies are doing and it is criminal. One is welcome to opt out to be defenseless but you cannot force a human
being to be defenseless. In my opinion is a fundamental human and civil right.
All opinions are welcome but expect some recoil. Some aspects I can understand because of all the stupid tacicool nonsense and also a few irresponsible people doing stupid things no matter what. We cannot control everyone.
But in the end this is the reality:
if law enforcement need any kind of gun, then, the otherwise defenseless citizens need those too for the very same reasons.
Otherwise we make privileged groups of people based on this and that and who knows what and that is against all the fundamental rights this nation was founded upon.
People are being murdered in gun free zones because they are not true gun free zones but pretending gun free zones like for example a school campus or a church vs. an airport secured perimeter after you go through a scanner and metal detector and you are inside a secured perimeter.
In Israel you have lots of those because of the security situation and they do work so the thugs and terrorists have opted for running people over with cars or trucks.
I hope you are not suggesting people should be defenseless or in an inferior position like they do not deserve to be able to preserve their own safety and lives or should be fine with less security.
That is what some anti-gun crazies are doing and it is criminal. One is welcome to opt out to be defenseless but you cannot force a human
being to be defenseless. In my opinion is a fundamental human and civil right.
Racist
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Thats WAAAYYYY CIIISSSTTT!
96coal449
.308 Win
The dream.
They want an unarmed populace for enslavement. PERIOD! Everyone needs to wake up.
Karpteach
6.5 Creedmoor
Hillbilly77
6.5 Creedmoor
He does have the constitutionally protected right to free speech, and he should, same as the rest of us.
However, the first amendment only limits the government’s ability to abridge his free speech rights.
The owners and administrators of this forum are under no obligation to put up with (nor provide a platform for) any member who posts nothing but inflammatory posts, stirring the pot at every turn.
The OP is nothing but a troll. Banning him would be no different than telling a bothersome houseguest that he is not welcome back in your home.
Banning somebody doesn’t affect his right to free speech in any way - it just tells him “You can’t do it in my house.”
I agree which is why I will only respond to everyone elses posts but him.
- Status