Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express

Lindsey Graham Hounded at Airport: 'You Traitor ... Audit Our Vote'
Protesters confronted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) at an airport over his refusal to challenge the electoral votes.

Amy Peikoff chief policy officer of Parler indicated Google has dropped them from the Play Store for Android devices on the Tucker Carlson show.Just read Apple is dropping Parler from its platform. So long 1st amendment. I guess the 2nd is next here in the USACCP.
Amy Peikoff chief policy officer of Parler indicated Google has dropped them from the Play Store for Android devices on the Tucker Carlson show.
So Parler may be gone in both the Apple and Android platforms
Yeah, it may work but on Tucker Carlson's show the Parler rep made it sound like it will be very difficult to financially survive after the Google and Apple cancelations. They were getting ready for something like this but did not expect it to happen immediately.Just the APK file to get it on your phone, they cannot stop it from existing and working.
Gab has its own servers and most of the Trump team is there. Gab got censored back in 2018 from the Apple and Play store. Gab rebuilt with its own website and servers. They are welcoming all Trump's team and supporters as their increase of memberships are going thru the roof.
The Parler.com site works, too.Just the APK file to get it on your phone, they cannot stop it from existing and working.
I would have no issue with anti gun folks on here (I wouldn't find it enjoyable and probably be frustrated) but I would think that they wouldn't stick around too long with the back and forth discussion we would have.Twitter and the rest deplatforming these people is not "censorship" nor is it it a "free speech" issue.
It's a freedom of association issue.
Would you also have NYGF be forced to provide a platform for anti-gun folks?
Not directed at you, FRB, just a thought I have everytime these people yell "censorship!!!"
Twitter and the rest deplatforming these people is not "censorship" nor is it it a "free speech" issue.
It's a freedom of association issue.
Would you also have NYGF be forced to provide a platform for anti-gun folks?
Not directed at you, FRB, just a thought I have everytime these people yell "censorship!!!"
I would have no issue with anti gun folks on here (I wouldn't find it enjoyable and probably be frustrated) but I would think that they wouldn't stick around too long with the back and forth discussion we would have.
Please, the emotional swamp on here is going to get pissed when things are put in black and white without the ability to make inferences and give their opinion about what Trump in fact said. He did incite the violence.
I guess you missed the sarcasm.By breathing ?
With all due respect, wise up.
Not following you. All I said was that if someone who was against guns wanted to hang out on this site for some strange reason as much as they would annoy me I wouldn't stop them. I would probably just put them on ignore eventually. Hell, we've had some in the past.So you'd be in favor of compulsory speech, and violating the owners' of this site's right to freedom of association?
Because ultimately, those are what these arguments are in favor of, not "free speech."
I guess you missed the sarcasm.
It's one of the few things that keeps me sane.If you can maintain a sense of humor, more power to you.
Not following you. All I said was that if someone who was against guns wanted to hang out on this site for some strange reason as much as they would annoy me I wouldn't stop them. I would probably just put them on ignore eventually. Hell, we've had some in the past.
Not following you. All I said was that if someone who was against guns wanted to hang out on this site for some strange reason as much as they would annoy me I wouldn't stop them. I would probably just put them on ignore eventually. Hell, we've had some in the past.
So you'd be in favor of compulsory speech, and violating the owners' of this site's right to freedom of association?
Because ultimately, those are what these arguments are in favor of, not "free speech."
IMHO there wouldn't be a section for anti gun talk. You asked if I would have a problem with folks that are anti gun being able to communicate on here, not have a special section for them. Should they be able to join and voice their opinion? I believe they should. I would vehemently disagree and most likely ignore them but they should be able to join and communicate amongst us and others like themselves. Again, I believe they wouldn't last very long because they would be outnumbered but if they want to they should be able to. Not saying to make certain changes to suit them. If conservative folks want to discuss amongst themselves on twitter or others they should be able to. I'm fine being on FB along with a world of lefties as long as I can communicate with like minded folks. It seems that conservative folks or sites don't try to shut out others who don't believe what they do yet the left has such a problem with people THEY don't agree with they take away THEIR ability to converse on their platforms.The argument that Twitter should be forced to keep accounts they do not want to keep is tantamount to requiring that NYGF have a section for anti-gun talk even though its obviously antithetical to the principles of this site.
Freedom of speech also includes the right to not be forced to promote speech one disagrees with.
Twitter and the rest deplatforming these people is not "censorship" nor is it it a "free speech" issue.
It's a freedom of association issue.
Would you also have NYGF be forced to provide a platform for anti-gun folks?
Not directed at you, FRB, just a thought I have everytime these people yell "censorship!!!"