Democrats explore barring Trump from holding office over Jan. 6 riot

[Dr. Evil]

Democrats explore barring Trump from holding office over Jan. 6 riot

Approximately a dozen Democratic lawmakers have publicly or privately spoken about applying Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, in relation to the deadly riot.

nypost.com

And there it is... their end game.

 

[ManualF150]

Give me a break... it was a peaceful protest...

If they want to know what a real riot is, then they need to see what's going on over in Kazakhstan.

 

[dwa12479]

I guess inwas really naive for thinking TDS would subside a little this year.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

Democrats should explore DIY frontal lobe ablation kits instead.

 

[Grimscale]

"Section 3 of the amendment, enacted in 1868 and best known for enshrining the Equal Protection Clause, prevents any government official who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the US from holding office again.

approximately a dozen Democratic lawmakers have publicly or privately spoken about applying Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to Trump, whom they accuse of inciting the Jan. 6 riot"


After a year of lies and bullshit, they still have not proven a damned thing, have no evidence of him being involved, hell, they don't even have evidence that there was an actual riot! Everything points to a peaceful protest exacerbated by the actions of the very government being protested.

At every step they just prove how lawless they are, while law-abiding citizens try to navigate the minefield of contradictory laws they create.
so this citizen no longer cares if he is "law-abiding" or not.
If a politician does not have to abide by the law then neither do I.

 

[diggs223]

I guess inwas really naive for thinking TDS would subside a little this year.

its a backup plan, they're voter fraud bill is in trouble, dominion has been exposed (though nothing being done)
dems and rino's are afraid of a possible orange wave

 

[spat]

"Section 3 of the amendment, enacted in 1868 and best known for enshrining the Equal Protection Clause, prevents any government official who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the US from holding office again.

approximately a dozen Democratic lawmakers have publicly or privately spoken about applying Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to Trump, whom they accuse of inciting the Jan. 6 riot"


After a year of lies and bullshit, they still have not proven a damned thing, have no evidence of him being involved, hell, they don't even have evidence that there was an actual riot! Everything points to a peaceful protest exacerbated by the actions of the very government being protested.

At every step they just prove how lawless they are, while law-abiding citizens try to navigate the minefield of contradictory laws they create.
so this citizen no longer cares if he is "law-abiding" or not.
If a politician does not have to abide by the law then neither do I.

They just hate democracy and are afraid the people might vote "wrong" again....

 

[technicalgadget]

They will be unable to stop the Trump train. All aboard!

 

[Catskillkid]

Well if that's the case every politician from every state where a BLM or Antifa riot took place needs to be removed from office. I say let's start in Portland, OR and Seattle, WA.

 

[Acer-m14]

“engaged in insurrection or rebellion”

so Mad Max has to leave office .. Rebellion ..