Yes of course, and people have done that.
All the Twitter outrage at Liberty for following industry practice of storing codes, yet it is very interesting, that Sturdy Safe added this to their FAQ:Only Safe Co. I ever even thought about using:
American Gun Safes & Vault Doors! Affordably Higher Security
Sturdy Gun Safe manufactures gun safes, pistol safes and vault doors sold direct at discounted pricing. Thicker steel, real fireproofing and custom options, for less!www.sturdysafe.com
www.sturdysafe.com
Which was not in their FAQ or on their website anywhere days ago before this happened to Liberty Safe: https://archive.ph/M4KyM
Yikes. I wouldn't ignore that but obviously political leanings of corporate people can't dictate all our purchases or there would be little left to buy. The fact is that most rich finance people are woke lefties and they are all elites.
Never said otherwise but I will buy American-made crap over Chinese crap as much as I can afford.
I was thinking of this yesterday. If one was in the position to be raided and had fuck you money, walk in vault with a safe inside, with a safe inside with dildos inside.
Do you see why the FBI is so happy now? The entire conversation is a misdirection. Rage at a safe company giving codes to a safe the FBI could already get in. As far as I know he hasn't been charged with any gun crimes. I'm sure they'll use his gun ownership to try to make him look scary, but what is hiding the guns even supposed to accomplish? Bail conditions would probably require him to surrender weapons, but otherwise, what is the point about the safe here? He should not even have been searched or arrested in the first place! The safe is irrelevant and doesn't help here.
This is an unpleasant surprise and newsworthy for anyone that owns a Liberty safe.
Important Info - If You Own a Liberty Safe, Get Rid of It - Company Provides Govt Access Codes to All Their Products - The Last Refuge
This is alarming, quite alarming. [H/T Collin Rugg] In a recent J6 case it has been revealed that Liberty Safe Co. gave the FBI background access codes to the safe and vault owned by the investigative target of the FBI, Nathan Hughes. As the story is told, the FBI (federal govt) contacted the...theconservativetreehouse.com
www.breitbart.com
I see a business opportunity for aftermarket electronic locks that do not have a backdoor.
www.breitbart.com
www.foxbusiness.com
That's an angle I thought about and haven't heard any of the "influencers" talk about. Liberty may very well have wanted to quickly aid the FBI in fear that they would be associated with the J6 suspect owning their product. Similar to how when a mass shooting happens they demonize the maker of the gun. So in other words, optics. Being that the overwhelming majority of Liberty's customers are most likely gun owners, the should have known better though. The gun grabbers aren't buying their safes!
Interesting second video. Whoever's property that was also needed another camera in a different location to pick up their rear tags as none of those vehicles had a front plate!
I guess but they will get into it one way or another if they want to or need to. They will beat it or call a locksmith.
Of course they’re going to get into Any safe if they really want to. That’s Not the point at all. There is no sense making it easy for them and the company that sells you said safe has absolutely no right in aiding and abetting the invasion of someone’s privacy.
They have that info when they build them.
Its the principle behind it thats upsetting. Liberty sells products that are supposed to keep your items safe and secure, folding like a cheap suit to the FBI doesn't exactly go along with that.
The situation with Apple was a little different though. They couldn't access the single device without building a backdoor into their software which would affect EVERY device of theirs in circulation.
