New York Starts Confiscating Firearms At Record Numbers

[Acer-m14]

We have seen a huge rise in numbers of confiscations across the country. One state leading the pack is California however not far behind is New York state which has issued over 9,000 red flags in less than a year. Half of which are permanent bans.

 

[TEOTWAWKI inc.]

Considering all the crime, the only logical next step is to take more guns faster.

 

[ManualF150]

Do you think Heil Hochul is going to care what the Supreme Court says? Nope.......

 

[RedBreast21]

I think it's fairly clear now that any decision from SCOTUS that goes against their agenda will be ignored. And honestly why not? Those decisions have ZERO consequences if not followed. ZERO. The constitution provides one remedy and that is elections.

 

[Rocpo]

If hockul refuses to follow the USSC decision, why must I comply with hockul's decrees?
Just as bucky does, I guess I can pick which laws I comply with.

 

[spat]

I think it's fairly clear now that any decision from SCOTUS that goes against their agenda will be ignored. And honestly why not? Those decisions have ZERO consequences if not followed. ZERO. The constitution provides one remedy and that is elections.

The constitution provides more remedies than that.

SCOTUS can issue a contempt charge.

Send some federal marshall's to lock some state officials up until they stop violating the order.

And the constitution also contains the final failsafe, the 2A.

 

[Jmac00]

We have seen a huge rise in numbers of confiscations across the country. One state leading the pack is California however not far behind is New York state which has issued over 9,000 red flags in less than a year. Half of which are permanent bans.

this is what I have been saying since the RF laws came out.

Mr Overliberal Chief of police, wakes up and says, who can we nab today. Oh look, this big mouth guy on NYGunforum thinks hes a smart ass, I think I'll Red flag his smart ass today......goes to a judge and 4 hours later NYGF member Mr Bigmouth Smartass, has his guns taken away, for no apparent reason. Guess what, you ain't getting them back, tough titties, file a complaint.

There is a reason the SCOTUS, in a 9-0 decision said RF laws are unconstitutional ~~~no due process, none, zero, zilch. yet Nazi Whorchul and blue state legislatures simply ignore the SC

 

[RedBreast21]

The constitution provides more remedies than that.

SCOTUS can issue a contempt charge.

Send some federal marshall's to lock some state officials up until they stop violating the order.

And the constitution also contains the final failsafe, the 2A.

Yeah no. Hochul didn't get a contempt charge nor are any coming from this court. As for Federal Marshals, well the Federal in their name should be enough to go on. lol

The first step is recognizing your reality. After that, better decisions can be made.

 

[spat]

Yeah no. Hochul didn't get a contempt charge nor are any coming from this court. As for Federal Marshals, well the Federal in their name should be enough to go on. lol

The first step is recognizing your reality. After that, better decisions can be made.

Just because those remedies haven't been used yet doesn't mean they don't exist.

SCOTUS *can* find a state official in contempt if they decide they are willingly defying them.

They *can* issue a federal warrant for their arrest.

I believe that warrant would be served by the marshals.

It's basically the same process that would happen if you try to ignore a court order for child support.

 

[Cooolone]

I think it's fairly clear now that any decision from SCOTUS that goes against their agenda will be ignored. And honestly why not? Those decisions have ZERO consequences if not followed. ZERO. The constitution provides one remedy and that is elections.

Ummmm, if you're going to quote the Constitution, don't cherry pick parts ... It provides a helluva lot more remedy than just waiting around for an election!

The constitution provides more remedies than that.

SCOTUS can issue a contempt charge.

Send some federal marshall's to lock some state officials up until they stop violating the order.

And the constitution also contains the final failsafe, the 2A.

^^^THIS^^^

Problem is... The SCOTUS has NO Teeth that they'll use! And the States, like this unfortunate example of one, KNOW this and take full advantage at the detriment of it's resident citizens.

So FUCK NY! Including the Governor who's just another empty suit autocrat enjoying happy times unchecked!

Was said a while ago, but today is more true that ever. We are experiencing the ultimate inversion, where the Govt acts however it likes, with impunity, and the citizens may only act with permission...

Now how the fuck did that happen?

When you step outside the pickle barrel, or, living here in NY, you'll see it's not true everywhere. That there are States still that embrace how things are supposed to be, that the Govt may operate with permission granted to it by it's citizens. Amazing concept huh?

 

[Deplorable Me]

Upstate NY man arrested after massive search was found with rifle, knives, troopers say

Troopers and other officers searched for the man for more than 24 hours, warning people to lock their homes and cars.

www.syracuse.com

This occurred over a welfare check. The never established who called it in. I guess we can get our neighbors and relatives to turn us in. Or anyone who has a hair up their ass.

 

[Zerex]

A neighbor dropped a dime on him.

I once worked in Chenango Forks on a road job...very poor community back then.

If you have guns, your neighbors know it.....like on my road.

He had an AW/ghost gun and 30 rd mags....he showed one too many people...............some one else may have been arrested, and in exchange for a lighter sentence, ratted on him.

I can tell you, that the cops keep tabs on everyone they can, by world of mouth. I got inspected for oversize mags twice, by friendly cops who had been here before the safe act and wnated to make sure I was "safe"......no over ten rounders here, but in Pa, where I keep them.

I keep a low profile and only hang with car and gun guys over age 40.

You MUST live like the French Resistance did.

Never argue with a woman, and cause an ex wife to want a welfare check on you.

 

[RedBreast21]

Ummmm, if you're going to quote the Constitution, don't cherry pick parts ... It provides a helluva lot more remedy than just waiting around for an election!


^^^THIS^^^

Problem is... The SCOTUS has NO Teeth that they'll use! And the States, like this unfortunate example of one, KNOW this and take full advantage at the detriment of it's resident citizens.

So FUCK NY! Including the Governor who's just another empty suit autocrat enjoying happy times unchecked!

Was said a while ago, but today is more true that ever. We are experiencing the ultimate inversion, where the Govt acts however it likes, with impunity, and the citizens may only act with permission...

Now how the fuck did that happen?

When you step outside the pickle barrel, or, living here in NY, you'll see it's not true everywhere. That there are States still that embrace how things are supposed to be, that the Govt may operate with permission granted to it by it's citizens. Amazing concept huh?

No it doesn't. But go ahead and cite it and we can discuss.

Everyone needs to stop acting as if the SCOTUS is a law making branch of government. That's actually a Democratic party belief. The remedy is for congress to either change or affirm through better language and legislation any law that went before the court and ruled on. Especially 5-4 decisions. But we can all hold our breath on the GOP to do so. In this case a constitutional convention needs to happen.

Congress can take action on NY through funding, but without the executive branches support, nothing will happen. It is in fact the AG responsibility to police SCOTUS decisions but again, without the support of the Senate who approves AG nominations and the executive branch, nothing happens because the nominee shouldn't have been passed through or the President intervenes.

So it is in fact, elections that remedy all.

 

[Celt]

We cant expect any help from the fed gov to reign in nys because they share the same communist ideology.

 

[RedBreast21]

Just because those remedies haven't been used yet doesn't mean they don't exist.

SCOTUS *can* find a state official in contempt if they decide they are willingly defying them.

They *can* issue a federal warrant for their arrest.

I believe that warrant would be served by the marshals.

It's basically the same process that would happen if you try to ignore a court order for child support.

I don't believe any violation or infraction of the constitution is a felony so therefor arrest warrants can't be issued. Treason is very specific.

SCOTUS decisions have two remedies. One is to amend the law so as to comply and the other is for the people to vote legislators in or out for change. Any new law can be challenged again. This is what we have now.

The constitution is basically a contract between the people and the government they elect. It can be changed or amended by the people.

 

[spat]

I don't believe any violation or infraction of the constitution is a felony so therefor arrest warrants can't be issued. Treason is very specific.

SCOTUS decisions have two remedies. One is to amend the law so as to comply and the other is for the people to vote legislators in or out for change. Any new law can be challenged again. This is what we have now.

The constitution is basically a contract between the people and the government they elect. It can be changed or amended by the people.

The warrant would be issued for contempt.

The court issued an order, the state official defied it. That's the textbook definition of contempt of court.

Contempt warrants are issued every day.


You think people can just ignore federal court orders with no consequences ?

 

[Acer-m14]

have no fear SWAT is here ...

ATF SWAT team raided a part-time FFL's home in Oklahoma.

 

[Beerman]

Upstate NY man arrested after massive search was found with rifle, knives, troopers say

Troopers and other officers searched for the man for more than 24 hours, warning people to lock their homes and cars.

www.syracuse.com

This occurred over a welfare check. The never established who called it in. I guess we can get our neighbors and relatives to turn us in. Or anyone who has a hair up their ass.

A bunch more to that story. Chapters. He threatened to kill Bush back around 2010. He’s been on the radar a looooooong time. Did hard time, just got out a couple short years ago. Always more to the story. Always.

 

[RedBreast21]

The warrant would be issued for contempt.

The court issued an order, the state official defied it. That's the textbook definition of contempt of court.

Contempt warrants are issued every day.


You think people can just ignore federal court orders with no consequences ?

Yeah they do ignore it. Eric Holder an example.

SCOTUS simply ruled on the constitutionality of NY's practice against NY's existing law and the State had to abide by the current law or the State legislature change the law. They Changed the law. The new law abides by the SCOTUS ruling but now the issue is "restricted" areas. Although the court cautioned on such a move it isn't contempt to ignore it as the ELECTED Assembly and Senate by the people did the peoples bidding. Put the new law to a vote by the residents of NY and what do you think the out come would be? It is now a NEW case to be heard by SCOTUS. This is nothing new if you have followed other non 2A rulings by SCOTUS.

 

[SomeSoldier]

I think it's fairly clear now that any decision from SCOTUS that goes against their agenda will be ignored. And honestly why not? Those decisions have ZERO consequences if not followed. ZERO. The constitution provides one remedy and that is elections.

If they don't care about SCOTUS, do you think they are going to let elections stop them? The Constitution provides only one clear way to fix a corrupt, broke, tyrannical government.

 

[spat]

Yeah they do ignore it. Eric Holder an example.

SCOTUS simply ruled on the constitutionality of NY's practice against NY's existing law and the State had to abide by the current law or the State legislature change the law. They Changed the law. The new law abides by the SCOTUS ruling but now the issue is "restricted" areas. Although the court cautioned on such a move it isn't contempt to ignore it as the ELECTED Assembly and Senate by the people did the peoples bidding. Put the new law to a vote by the residents of NY and what do you think the out come would be? It is now a NEW case to be heard by SCOTUS. This is nothing new if you have followed other non 2A rulings by SCOTUS.

Yes, that's why nobody has had a contempt charged yet.

But, you can't just ignore SCOTUS wishes. You may jerk them around for a while, but eventually they need to either put a stop to it, or they will become irrelevant.

They issue an order that some law is not enforcable.

The state jerks them around, without flat out saying "fuck you", by passing another law that does the same thing (or worse) with just minor changes.

The next level of escalation for SCOTUS would be an order prohibiting those sorts of laws in general. Possibly establishing some sort of "consent agreement" that would require any new NY laws in that vein to be pre-approved before they could be enforced (see many examples in the civil rights era. There are *still* states that cannot pass election laws without approval.

If the state chose to continue to play stupid games, then SCOTUS would hold the relevant officials in contempt, and could go so far as to issue warrants for their arrest.



This has all been worked out during the civil rights era, when states did not want to comport with those SCOTUS rulings.


RKBA is just another civil right. It can and should be enforced the same way the equal protection ones were. That includes when state officials refuse to recognize them.

 

[RedBreast21]

Yes, that's why nobody has had a contempt charged yet.

But, you can't just ignore SCOTUS wishes. You may jerk them around for a while, but eventually they need to either put a stop to it, or they will become irrelevant.

They issue an order that some law is not enforceable.

The state jerks them around, without flat out saying "fuck you", by passing another law that does the same thing (or worse) with just minor changes.

The next level of escalation for SCOTUS would be an order prohibiting those sorts of laws in general. Possibly establishing some sort of "consent agreement" that would require any new NY laws in that vein to be pre-approved before they could be enforced (see many examples in the civil rights era. There are *still* states that cannot pass election laws without approval.

If the state chose to continue to play stupid games, then SCOTUS would hold the relevant officials in contempt, and could go so far as to issue warrants for their arrest.



This has all been worked out during the civil rights era, when states did not want to comport with those SCOTUS rulings.


RKBA is just another civil right. It can and should be enforced the same way the equal protection ones were. That includes when state officials refuse to recognize them.

I agree. But you and others need to read non 2A cases by SCOTUS to understand that what NY is doing isn't that far beyond the scope of normal.

But that is where we are at. The court does not have that power to physical arrest, detain, fine or otherwise force punitive damages. If it did it would have acted through the DOJ. The DOJ we all know is a shit show.

Our society either works or doesn't based on principals "We The People" install. We can follow them or flat out ignore them. I believe it is abundantly clear those in power are currently ignoring them. Once again, they need to be removed from office through elections.

Well there is one other way.....

 

[RedBreast21]

If they don't care about SCOTUS, do you think they are going to let elections stop them? The Constitution provides only one clear way to fix a corrupt, broke, tyrannical government.

Well no. We have third world election now. I believe we have seen this already. But just wait on the stunt they're about to pull off to sell 2024.

 

[spat]

I agree. But you and others need to read non 2A cases by SCOTUS to understand that what NY is doing isn't that far beyond the scope of normal.

But that is where we are at. The court does not have that power to physical arrest, detain, fine or otherwise force punitive damages. If it did it would have acted through the DOJ. The DOJ we all know is a shit show.

Our society either works or doesn't based on principals "We The People" install. We can follow them or flat out ignore them. I believe it is abundantly clear those in power are currently ignoring them. Once again, they need to be removed from office through elections.

Well there is one other way.....

There is a federal law enforcement agency that answers directly to SCOTUS and is not part of the executive branch, or answerable to POTUS

Supreme Court of the United States Police Department - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

While it would be extraordinary for them (and not the executive branch marshalls) to enforce a warrant for contempt, it would not be impossible.

What would a state do, use the state police to arrest the marshalls who came to deliver the warrant ? Would the executive branch feds be able to stand down for *that* ?

 

[prambo]

Meh...

No!

 

[FrankenCub]

Upstate NY man arrested after massive search was found with rifle, knives, troopers say

Troopers and other officers searched for the man for more than 24 hours, warning people to lock their homes and cars.

www.syracuse.com

This occurred over a welfare check. The never established who called it in. I guess we can get our neighbors and relatives to turn us in. Or anyone who has a hair up their ass.

This was more than a welfare check, that was used to contact him. He was already a prohibited person. He has an extensive history with LE. He's even made threats to secret service when Bush was in office.

I see @Beerman beat me to it lol

 

[RedBreast21]

There is a federal law enforcement agency that answers directly to SCOTUS and is not part of the executive branch, or answerable to POTUS

Supreme Court of the United States Police Department - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

While it would be extraordinary for them (and not the executive branch marshalls) to enforce a warrant for contempt, it would not be impossible.

What would a state do, use the state police to arrest the marshalls who came to deliver the warrant ? Would the executive branch feds be able to stand down for *that* ?

Our system isn't working nor do those in power want to play by the rules. This is not a unique situation as much as you might want it to be. There is plenty of precedent for their actions and they rely on that. SCOTUS, with their majority isn't pushing this because of precedent. The country has been sliding into a third world hell hole for over 40 years. The only way to change it is to change those in power. That means elections or.....

 

[Acer-m14]

This was more than a welfare check, that was used to contact him. He was already a prohibited person. He has an extensive history with LE. He's even made threats to secret service when Bush was in office.

so all the gun laws do not work .. FACT ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

gun laws are all null n void ..


the cop needed to reach out to him .. your busted again .. but we got a job we you need to do and we will drop all the charges ..