Sex Work Would Be Broadly Legal in New York Under New Bill

[livingston]

Sex Work Would Be Broadly Legal in New York Under New Bill
The bill removes penalties for buying and selling sex in many cases
A group of lawmakers first called for legislation in February, but on Monday they finally came forward with a 13-page bill that would bring dramatic changes to the sex trade in the state.
A companion bill was also introduced in the Assembly on Monday, with five sponsors
First-of-its-Kind NY Bill Would Broadly Legalize Sex Work

 

[kev74]

I wonder how they'll be taxing it?

 

[Deplorable Me]

This could lead to some awkward moments in HR in the near future.

 

[oc shooter]

Don’t see this passing

 

[kev74]

This could lead to some awkward moments in HR in the near future.

What I do on my lunch break is my business.

 

[HEX]

I really don't know how to feel about this one.
Generally speaking I'm for less laws and government interference/babysitting on people's choices.. but this is a really complicated thing with major pros and cons over such a huge scale of different issues. What's more is that there's really no proven information that supports the claims of any assumed results on either side of the argument.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Don’t see this passing

We elect em, don't we?

 

[ProgSpear]

Progressives simply doing their thing; destroy any vestige of traditional morality anywhere and anytime you find it.

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

NY has been fucking people for quite some time know. Apparently it's already legal.

 

[BDinPutnam]

NY has been fucking people for quite some time know. Apparently it's already legal.

We certainly pay for the privilege.

 

[kev74]

NY has been fucking people for quite some time know. Apparently it's already legal.

Only legal if its figurative, not literal. For now...

 

[Exonautic]

I will never understand the mindset of, well a bunch of marginalized people are turning to these illegal activities to get by, so let's just make it legal.

Like, wasn't it legal for a reason in the first place

 

[Darth]

Good, it should be.

I have yet to hear a single compelling argument as to why sex work for money should not be legal.

You have a service that people are willing to pay for. You both agree to the terms. Government: NO WAY JOSE! Bullshit.

The demonization of sex in this country is utter bullshit.

It should be known by now that I "act" (star? participate? take up space?) in femdom porn videos. People pay for said videos. I don't give a shit who knows and I tell people, because who the heck is anyone to tell me what I can and can't do with a girl (or other ) I've agreed to?

I really don't know how to feel about this one.
Generally speaking I'm for less laws and government interference/babysitting on people's choices.. but this is a really complicated thing with major pros and cons over such a huge scale of different issues. What's more is that there's really no proven information that supports the claims of any assumed results on either side of the argument.

Ok, I have to hear what the cons are of 2+ consenting people trading money for service.

 

[Prominus]

Should be legal. I mean its already legal to kill children if its your body. Why wouldn't it be legal to stick something in there for money.

It's a revolving door. Stick something in for money and pay the state taxes. Then kill the outcome and make planned parent hood money.

 

[Edwardteach72]

Oh noooo legalizing two consenting (or more) adults doing something together with the exchange of money ohhh the horror

 

[subsonic]

The demonetization of sex in this country is utter bullshit.

It should be known by now that I "act" (star? participate? take up space?) in femdom porn videos. People pay for said videos. I don't give a shit who knows and I tell people, because who the heck is anyone to tell me what I can and can't do with a girl (or other ) I've agreed to?

You're a degenerate cuck who literally defends child pornography:

Ehh, this is where I defend even child porn under the 1A.
I know it's typically "what 2 consenting adults do is none of my business", but here I find it laughable that people think some invented number they must reach first will make us all more moral.

And I'm all for shaming and ostracizing degenerates like you as long as you're openly advocating and defending this degeneracy.

As for this bill, I don't see it passing in New York. I expect they might end up doing something like the so-called Swedish model where they treat women as victims and legalize prostitution while enhancing criminal penalties on johns. This is already happening in practice with some DAs. While New York is going to continue destroying families and institutions they won't stop criminalizing and pathologizing men.

 

[Saltwater60]

I would not pay for sex and I think it’s gross. Morally I think it’s wrong, but if they made it legal I seriously don’t care. Think about it you can go to a bar, meet a girl, pay for dinner, and drinks to get laid what’s the difference. People screw all the time for free. As a rule of thumb I don’t want my thing where many others things have been. STd’s Gross me out.

 

[Saltwater60]

You're a degenerate cuck who literally defends child pornography:

And I'm all for shaming and ostracizing degenerates like you as long as you're openly advocating and defending this degeneracy.

As for this bill, I don't see it passing in New York. I expect they might end up doing something like the so-called Swedish model where they treat women as victims and legalize prostitution while enhancing criminal penalties on johns. This is already happening in practice with some DAs. While New York is going to continue destroying families and institutions they won't stop criminalizing and pathologizing men.

Just curious where you get that he is advocating for child porn from this?

 

[subsonic]

Just curious where you get that he is advocating for child porn from this?

I quoted and linked it in the other thread in my post. In his words, "Ehh, this is where I defend even child porn under the 1A."

 

[Edwardteach72]

I would not pay for sex and I think it’s gross. Morally I think it’s wrong, but if they made it legal I seriously don’t care. Think about it you can go to a bar, meet a girl, pay for dinner, and drinks to get laid what’s the difference. People screw all the time for free. As a rule of thumb I don’t want my thing where many others things have been. STd’s Gross me out.

Then you just havent gotten any of the good ones ahhaha jk

 

[Hillbilly77]

“Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn’t selling fucking legal? Why should it be illegal to sell something that’s perfectly legal to give away?”

- George Carlin

 

[Darth]

You're a degenerate cuck who literally defends child pornography:

And I'm all for shaming and ostracizing degenerates like you as long as you're openly advocating and defending this degeneracy.

As for this bill, I don't see it passing in New York. I expect they might end up doing something like the so-called Swedish model where they treat women as victims and legalize prostitution while enhancing criminal penalties on johns. This is already happening in practice with some DAs. While New York is going to continue destroying families and institutions they won't stop criminalizing and pathologizing men.

If that post was supposed to “shame” me, you missed by 10 miles.

You being too illiterate to actually read the post you attempt to slander me with is not my concern.

 

[Darth]

I would not pay for sex and I think it’s gross. Morally I think it’s wrong, but if they made it legal I seriously don’t care. Think about it you can go to a bar, meet a girl, pay for dinner, and drinks to get laid what’s the difference. People screw all the time for free. As a rule of thumb I don’t want my thing where many others things have been. STd’s Gross me out.

Then again, each person she has slept with is a “fuck you” to the “holier than thou” crew and party.

Orwell mentions this in 1984.

 

[Phazer]

Orwell mentions this in 1984.

Thanks for reminding me to read that novel again. I haven't read it since 1984 in English class.

 

[subsonic]

If that post was supposed to “shame” me, you missed by 10 miles.

You being too illiterate to actually read the post you attempt to slander me with is not my concern.

I don’t expect a degenerate like you to feel shame, but quoting you is not slander.

It’s not to shame you, just to highlight your admitted degeneracy to others who don’t know better.

You literally said you defend child porn. So it’s zero surprise that you’re also proud to advertise your participation in “femdom porn.”

 

[Shadow2]

NY politics is full of whores anyway why not make it official.

 

[Darth]

I don’t expect a degenerate like you to feel shame, but quoting you is not slander.

It’s not to shame you, just to highlight your admitted degeneracy to others who don’t know better.

You literally said you defend child porn. So it’s zero surprise that you’re also proud to advertise your participation in “femdom porn.”

The word “degeneracy” carries slightly less weight than the current use of “bigot” and “racist.” But even that’s irrelevant when your opinion is of no concern to anybody.

Yes, I did say that I defend child porn in that thread. I specifically said that for the shock value. To highlight the absurdity that some dumbfuck will see that and beat his chest without bothering to read why. Clearly you didn’t, but those that did know why I said it in that thread and I will say it again: Charging 16 year olds with sex crimes for consensual acts is immoral.

My Facebook cover photo is a snapshot from one of the videos. Still waiting for even one valid reason for what is in any way wrong or bad about that.

One that doesn’t involve quoting a book of fables written by uneducated savages preferably.

 

[Jmac00]

my guess is, some NYC politicians got caught soliciting prostitutes and may be facing major fines and or removal from office. So what do you do when you get caught, you make the illegal, LEGAL.

BRILLIANT, absolutely brilliant

 

[CaseHardened]

I really don't know how to feel about this one.
Generally speaking I'm for less laws and government interference/babysitting on people's choices.. but this is a really complicated thing with major pros and cons over such a huge scale of different issues. What's more is that there's really no proven information that supports the claims of any assumed results on either side of the argument.

Women are going to do this one way or another.

I'm 100% for any plan to make this safer for those who choose to sell themselves.

 

[Criticalt]

I would not pay for sex and I think it’s gross. Morally I think it’s wrong, but if they made it legal I seriously don’t care. Think about it you can go to a bar, meet a girl, pay for dinner, and drinks to get laid what’s the difference. People screw all the time for free. As a rule of thumb I don’t want my thing where many others things have been. STd’s Gross me out.

You and I are lucky that we are super hot and can get laid in a bar.
However, there are ALOT of guys, who for different reasons, cannot get laid.
Whether it be that they are awkward, socially inept, or just plain fugly, theycan go years, even decades without any physical contact.
Check out the Incel (involuntary celibate) community.
I personally know a couple guys who havent had female intetaction in years.
Legal prostitution could greatly improve these guys lives.