Who cares?So much for the 1st. No one seem to be upset over this, I don't understand why that it. It outrages me!
......and thats not working out too good either.there is only one thing that backs up the 1st
and that is the 2nd ..
They work in concert.there is only one thing that backs up the 1st
and that is the 2nd ..
Wait till he gets to prisonI don't know? I think the 10 years in prison for slandering Hitlary is a good deal. at least she didn't suicide the guy.........yet!
Whatever happened to Tucker Carlson?Trying to figure something out here. I live in China yet all of the people I see every day have round eyes.![]()
Whatever happened to Tucker Carlson?
View attachment 272516
![]()
TUCKER CARLSON: Transgenderism is the most dangerous extremist movement in the United States
Fox News host Tucker Carlson sounds the alarm that America is no longer a Christian country, but instead has a new religion - transgenderism, which he believes is a recipe for extremism on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."www.foxnews.com
Unless they are going to compensate him for all he's been through, then the process was the punishment.United States v. Mackey, No. 23-7577 (2d Cir.)
No jail for him.
His conviction was overturned.
Unless they are going to compensate him for all he's been through, then the process was the punishment.
What did the EO actually say ?We did just have a president sign an EO making, quite possibly the most substantial litmus test for free speech, illegal, so there is that.
No, even that back pedal doesn't cut it. It's blatantly clear the pandering he's doing with this. The right loses all concept of what the 1A is when they don't agree with things.What did the EO actually say ?
I'm not going to get wound up about what the media claims it says.
A quick skim of the actual order doesn't seem to be anywhere near what the media claim it is.
It acknowledges that on it's own burning a flag is a protected activity. But when conducted as part of another crime or as a threat for instance they should throw the book at the offender.
I'm OK with that. Immediate threats have never been protected activity. And arson isn't suddenly OK just because you throw a flag on the fire.
Actual text of the order if you want to form your own opinion on it instead of just regurgitating one from some talking head.
Prosecuting Burning of The American Flag – The White House Prosecuting Burning of The American Flag
We all know that in the past people would have gotten a pass on many of those crimes if they involved the right speech.No, even that back pedal doesn't cut it. It's blatantly clear the pandering he's doing with this. The right loses all concept of what the 1A is when they don't agree with things.
We already have laws against, as you say, arson and similar illegal acts. No need whatsoever for this chest thumping crap.
It's right up there with "hate crimes/speech."
If it makes the punishment even 1% more severe, that means, necessarily. that you are being punished for the speech you find distasteful.
Let me know when those on this forum would be as willing to digest this same law with the LGBTQ crosswalk paintings. "Well that burnout you did will now became double illegal because you did it on a rainbow flag. " Come on, let's be honest here.
Who cares?
Did you see that Travis kelce is in Argentina to see Taylor swift?