Trump makes statement about suppressors

ArmedCorgi

ArmedCorgi

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,422
Reaction score
22,645
Location
Utahardia
Modean said:
Well, neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is required to defend ones self or others, so what’s your issue? My ARs work just fine without those add ons. And and far as being a boomer, what’s your issue there?
Click to expand...
Neither is a gun, I want all the toys.
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,832
Reaction score
15,282
Location
Rochester
Modean said:
Neither a suppressor or a bumpstock is an arm either.
Click to expand...

So how would you define the term "arm"?
I define it as more than just the actual piece of the firearm the bullets go into to be fired.

Stocks are arms. So are magazines, ammo, scopes/sights, and any other part designed for, and utilized on, a firearm.
And before you spout the "then ATF can regulate" bullshit, the Second Amendment says they can't.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
Grimscale said:
So how would you define the term "arm"?
I define it as more than just the actual piece of the firearm the bullets go into to be fired.

Stocks are arms. So are magazines, ammo, scopes/sights, and any other part designed for, and utilized on, a firearm.
And before you spout the "then ATF can regulate" bullshit, the Second Amendment says they can't.
Click to expand...

You can try all you want, but fudds and closeted anti 2A "gun owners" will not agree, they will continue to justify all infringements because again they are no different than the anti gunners. Ok the difference is atleast anti gunners have the fucking balls to admit that they are not pro 2A
 
Celt

Celt

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,690
Reaction score
20,027
Location
Westchester
Uzi said:
Better than Hillary though. :confused:
Click to expand...
Is he not? That statement has been beaten up badly already and is ignorant.

No true 2a supporter is going to like Trump taking ANY position against anything firearm related, but to think we had any better option is foolish. Not to mention over 100 conservative federal court appointments, booming economy, low unemployment, etc...,etc... to think hitlery would have done better for 2a supporters or Americans in general is ridiculous.
 
M

Modean

.223 Rem
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
2,769
Location
Oswego County
Edwardteach72 said:
You can try all you want, but fudds and closeted anti 2A "gun owners" will not agree, they will continue to justify all infringements because again they are no different than the anti gunners. Ok the difference is atleast anti gunners have the fucking balls to admit that they are not pro 2A
Click to expand...
Interesting that you feel the need throw shade on anyone who doesn’t 100% agree with your position. I thought that was a lefty thing. Guess not.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
Modean said:
Interesting that you feel the need throw shade on anyone who doesn’t 100% agree with your position. I thought that was a lefty thing. Guess not.
Click to expand...

Sorry I dont pander to turncoat anti gun people like yourself


***secret**** shhhhh I'm not actually sorry that I wont pander to turncoats like yourself

***edit*** that's cute that you use "throw shade" to try and convey you know the hip young lingo hahahhaha thats cute you're probably cute as well
 
Last edited:
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
Supporting gun control
Modean said:
I thought that was a lefty thing. Guess not.
Click to expand...

Since you are trying to imply you are not a leftist and yet here you are defending gun control (so much so you are without openly saying the words safe act, backing Cuomo and you clearly support the safe act)
 
subsonic

subsonic

.44 mag
Messages
788
Reaction score
887
Location
New York State
I think he’s uninformed, speaking off the cuff to a reporter shouting a question at him, and never seriously thought about suppressors.

Clearly guns have never been an especially near and dear issue to Trump’s heart (despite him being a N.Y. pistol permit holder), but I predict nothing will come of that comment and if it came up in the future he might deny making it, Trump fashion.

Anyway you could say goodbye to the hearing protection act until 2020 after the last midterm election anyway. Won’t happen with the current congress. There’s no sense in reading too much into this one statement in this context.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
subsonic said:
I think he’s uninformed, speaking off the cuff to a reporter shouting a question at him, and never seriously thought about suppressors.

Clearly guns have never been an especially near and dear issue to Trump’s heart (despite him being a N.Y. pistol permit holder), but I predict nothing will come of that comment and if it came up in the future he might deny making it, Trump fashion.

Anyway you could say goodbye to the hearing protection act until 2020 after the last midterm election anyway. Won’t happen with the current congress. There’s no sense in reading too much into this one statement in this context.
Click to expand...


Well doesnt seem much like it was off the cuff, he just did an interview with ol Pierce Morgan and again said he doesnt like them and is considering banning them
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
BDinPutnam said:
You could've just stopped at "did an interview with Piers Morgan."
Click to expand...

I actually thought about doing that hahaha, but come on you "know" me I cant just stop at that... I will say I almost did mention that all those that think the bumpstock ban was "good or even just what ever it's a stupid toy" must love that they are on the same side as Piers Morgan
 
Prominus

Prominus

9mm
Messages
93
Reaction score
147
Location
Andes
Bunch of clowns in here. Suppressors do not make a firearm silent. They protect your hearing. It is not like a Hollywood movie. They are legal in most states. They are regulated and must be registered. And thinking anything firearm related should be banned because you dont use or care about it is dumb. You will be mad eventually when they ban something you want or need. You need to draw the line or the fucking list will keep growing.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,064
Location
New York
Prominus said:
Bunch of clowns in here. Suppressors do not make a firearm silent. They protect your hearing. It is not like a Hollywood movie. They are legal in most states. They are regulated and must be registered. And thinking anything firearm related should be banned because you dont use or care about it is dumb. You will be mad eventually when they ban something you want or need. You need to draw the line or the fucking list will keep growing.
Click to expand...

:goodpost:
Oh God this post did not end how I thought it was going to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top